For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud

marke

Well-known member
Trump supports abortion and homosexuality.

Why would Hoefling want to work with him?
Ross Perot had some good ideas also, but by splitting the conservative vote he guaranteed Bill Clinton a win with significantly less than a majority of American support. Hoefling, like John Kasich in 2016, could not garner enough support to win a presidential primary so his campaign was doomed to failure from the start. It makes little sense to try to elect a conservative Christian as president when there is so little widespread support among Americans for that sort of leadership. Voting for some good candidates, like I did in the 2016 primary, turned out to be fruitless and even pointless. My candidate for president lost the 2016 primary but I voted for Trump in the general election because he was far away and above the best candidate compared to Hillary. (I definitely did not vote for Kasich at any time.)

I do support voting for Christian conservatives in the primary, but not in the general election if their names are not headlined on the ballot.
 

Derf

Well-known member
My side of this issue isn't the one that's been tossed out of court for lack of evidence by conservative judges, some of whom were appointed by Trump himself. You're losing it. In court. Literally.
Less now than before. AZ legislature had to sue Maricopa county board of supervisors to get the to give over materials, etc. And they won. GA is doing so as well, as @marke has pointed out.

But thanks for acknowledging with silence that I didn’t admit there was no evidence. I’d appreciate a retraction.
 

User Name

Well-known member
Less now than before. AZ legislature had to sue Maricopa county board of supervisors to get the to give over materials, etc. And they won. GA is doing so as well, as @marke has pointed out.
Winning a suit to "get the to give over materials, etc" proves nothing, I'm afraid.
But thanks for acknowledging with silence that I didn’t admit there was no evidence. I’d appreciate a retraction.
All I did was quote you, so if you retract your quote, I will retract it as well.
 

Derf

Well-known member
Winning a suit to "get the to give over materials, etc" proves nothing, I'm afraid.

All I did was quote you, so if you retract your quote, I will retract it as well.
Nope. You quoted and interpreted. But that's what I expect of you at this point. I'm sorry you've reached such lows levels in my expectations.
 

User Name

Well-known member
I'm sorry you've reached such lows levels in my expectations.
Get used to it kid. Also, get used to conservative judges appointed by Trump tossing out these voter fraud cases for lack of evidence. Also get used to crazy lawyers like Sidney Powell getting the kraken unleashed on them by Dominion and Smartmatic.
 

marke

Well-known member
Winning a suit to "get the to give over materials, etc" proves nothing, I'm afraid.

All I did was quote you, so if you retract your quote, I will retract it as well.
Why do democrats "fight like hell" to keep voting unprotected from fraud by claiming voter protections suppress the black vote? They tell the truth if they are saying voter protections suppress black voter fraud.
 

marke

Well-known member
Get used to it kid. Also, get used to conservative judges appointed by Trump tossing out these voter fraud cases for lack of evidence. Also get used to crazy lawyers like Sidney Powell getting the kraken unleashed on them by Dominion and Smartmatic.
How many cases have been tossed out for lack of evidence? Very few. How many cases have been tossed out for jurisdictional issues or technical reasons which have nothing to do with the legitimacy of the voter fraud allegations? Most.
 

Derf

Well-known member
Get used to it kid. Also, get used to conservative judges appointed by Trump tossing out these voter fraud cases for lack of evidence. Also get used to crazy lawyers like Sidney Powell getting the kraken unleashed on them by Dominion and Smartmatic.
I'm curious to see how Kraken does in all this. I was disappointed when her attorneys used the technicality defense, but she seems to have forced them to go a different route. I've never been sued, so I don't know how much influence the client has in the plea--I thought they had to agree.
 

User Name

Well-known member
How many cases have been tossed out for lack of evidence? Very few. How many cases have been tossed out for jurisdictional issues or technical reasons which have nothing to do with the legitimacy of the voter fraud allegations? Most.
 

Leatherneck

Well-known member
The obvious is that there's no substantial evidence for fraud and in no way would I make excuses for it if there was, as on record.
Sure there is but you ignoring the obvious speaks volumes. All the swing states shut down the count near the same time, and mysteriously when they opened up ( hours later ) Trump’s lead ( substantial lead) was gone and hidin pedo Joe jumped ahead. Do keep on spewing the false narrative that you have been given there isn’t a bit of truth in denying the fraud it just shows that you are a fraud.
 

User Name

Well-known member
Good luck separating the completely corrupt Democrats from the totally corrupt ones.
Bob Enyart will tell you that the Republicans do the same things as the Democrats, but the Republicans just do it slower so you don't notice. If so, good luck with that.
 

marke

Well-known member
Why should anyone be surprised that a democrat-sponsored 'statistical analysis' of 2020 election results supported democrat claims that this was the most accurate and honest election in the history of the US?
 
Top