"Far Too Wondrous" --Darwin

[Interplanner]

The flaw in evolution, that Darwin was aware of, was that many creatures had features that were "far too wondrous" to have happened by mutation processes. But evolution was not about making scientific sense anyway. It was the wealthy English classes way of escaping the shame of human trafficking and of blasting the poor with white sugar diets, and of fighting back, ideologically, against the 'scandalous' US Constitution.

The Constitution positioned a Creator as the basis for human rights for all. The racism inherent in evolution (right from the title page of OS) is why the residue of racism existed in America, but it was being eliminated. This is why the Left's claims of racism today run so late and so far off the mark. The Left needs to protect anti-religion as the answer to everything the Constitution created, which they see as a failure. Except Islam. The Left is still on a euphoric blind date with it.

[This paragraph is the theme of my newest short novel DELUGE OF SUSPICIONS at Amazon.com].

 

[chair]

The flaw in evolution, that Darwin was aware of, was that many creatures had features that were "far too wondrous" to have happened by mutation processes.

Did Darwin actually write or say that?

But evolution was not about making scientific sense anyway. It was the wealthy English classes way of escaping the shame of human trafficking and of blasting the poor with white sugar diets, and of fighting back, ideologically, against the 'scandalous' US Constitution.

You have confused your conspiracy theories. How did you get white sugar into that.
In any case, this is utter nonsense, and not a logical argument of any sort.

The Constitution positioned a Creator as the basis for human rights for all.

It did?
Where?

The racism inherent in evolution (right from the title page of OS).

Darwin used the term "race" much differently than we do today.
"On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life" is referring to the species (mostly animals) that survive natural selection.

This is from awikipedia article on Racism:
Darwin’s publication of this book occurred within the heated debates between advocates of monogeny, who held that all races came from a common ancestor, and advocates of polygeny, who held that the races were separately created. Darwin, who had come from a family with strong abolitionist ties, had experienced and was disturbed by cultures of slavery during his voyage on the Beagle years earlier. Noted Darwin biographers Adrian Desmond and James Moore argue that Darwin’s writings on evolution were not only influenced by his abolitionist tendencies, but also his belief that non-white races were equal in regard to their intellectual capacity as white races, a belief which had been strongly disputed by scientists such as Morton, Agassiz and Broca, all noted polygenists.

I will not be buying your book. I wouldn't even read it for free.

 

[patrick jane]

The flaw in evolution, that Darwin was aware of, was that many creatures had features that were "far too wondrous" to have happened by mutation processes. But evolution was not about making scientific sense anyway. It was the wealthy English classes way of escaping the shame of human trafficking and of blasting the poor with white sugar diets, and of fighting back, ideologically, against the 'scandalous' US Constitution.

The Constitution positioned a Creator as the basis for human rights for all. The racism inherent in evolution (right from the title page of OS) is why the residue of racism existed in America, but it was being eliminated. This is why the Left's claims of racism today run so late and so far off the mark. The Left needs to protect anti-religion as the answer to everything the Constitution created, which they see as a failure. Except Islam. The Left is still on a euphoric blind date with it.

[This paragraph is the theme of my newest short novel DELUGE OF SUSPICIONS at Amazon.com].

good post

 

[patrick jane]

Did Darwin actually write or say that?



You have confused your conspiracy theories. How did you get white sugar into that.
In any case, this is utter nonsense, and not a logical argument of any sort.



It did?
Where?




Darwin used the term "race" much differently than we do today.
"On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life" is referring to the species (mostly animals) that survive natural selection.

This is from awikipedia article on Racism:
Darwin’s publication of this book occurred within the heated debates between advocates of monogeny, who held that all races came from a common ancestor, and advocates of polygeny, who held that the races were separately created. Darwin, who had come from a family with strong abolitionist ties, had experienced and was disturbed by cultures of slavery during his voyage on the Beagle years earlier. Noted Darwin biographers Adrian Desmond and James Moore argue that Darwin’s writings on evolution were not only influenced by his abolitionist tendencies, but also his belief that non-white races were equal in regard to their intellectual capacity as white races, a belief which had been strongly disputed by scientists such as Morton, Agassiz and Broca, all noted polygenists.

I will not be buying your book. I wouldn't even read it for free.

C'mon chair, we know you're a Jew but take a refresher course on the Constitution again. We are endowed by the Creator. Go back to your Christian bashing

 

[chair]

C'mon chair, we know you're a Jew but take a refresher course on the Constitution again. We are endowed by the Creator. Go back to your Christian bashing

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator " is in the Declaration of Independence. not the Constitution.

It is indeed time for a refresher course.

 

[Zeke]

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator " is in the Declaration of Independence. not the Constitution.

It is indeed time for a refresher course.

Well some where not included in the ALL, the signers posterity were the only ones included in that mostly Masonic family tree, royal bloodline rubbish/crumbs that fall from their table for the Goyim to fight over.

It's always been a Cast system that hides behind various labels, anyone outside that loop are cannon fodder or lab rats, the crumbs that fall from that table now are mostly poison.

Just like you're will and testament pertains to you're family, and maybe a few adopted strangers, so does the compact of this Corporate run nation, owed by a few rich Families with ties to the Crown,(legal name fraud) and the Vatican (religious fraud) in bed with the Bankers (Usery fraud) who fleece the Goyim.

Got ID? then they are fleecing you're Soul.

 

[Interplanner]

Well some where not included in the ALL, the signers posterity were the only ones included in that mostly Masonic family tree, royal bloodline rubbish/crumbs that fall from their table for the Goyim to fight over.

It's always been a Cast system that hides behind various labels, anyone outside that loop are cannon fodder or lab rats, the crumbs that fall from that table now are mostly poison.

Just like you're will and testament pertains to you're family, and maybe a few adopted strangers, so does the compact of this Corporate run nation, owed by a few rich Families with ties to the Crown,(legal name fraud) and the Vatican (religious fraud) in bed with the Bankers (Usery fraud) who fleece the Goyim.

Got ID? then they are fleecing you're Soul.

Not the America I know. Millions of people with productive, fufilled lives so long as they don't take government handouts.

 

[Interplanner]

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator " is in the Declaration of Independence. not the Constitution.

It is indeed time for a refresher course.

You're technically right; what is the point? I suppose the DI and the Constitution are like, way opposed to each other?

 

[Interplanner]

Enjoy what evolution wanted to create:

http://nwcreation.net/videos/Hitler_and_the_Nazi_Darwinian_Worldview.html

 

[Interplanner]

Enjoy what evolution wanted to create:

http://nwcreation.net/videos/Slaughter_of_the_Dissidents.html

 

[PureX]

good post

Except for that fact that's it's a lie. Darwin never wrote that "many creatures had features that were "far too wondrous" to have happened by mutation processes" because Darwin wasn't aware of the role of mutation in the origins of species. Darwin was only aware of natural selection as the origin of species.

 

[chair]

Well some where not included in the ALL, the signers posterity were the only ones included in that mostly Masonic family tree, royal bloodline rubbish/crumbs that fall from their table for the Goyim to fight over.

It's always been a Cast system that hides behind various labels, anyone outside that loop are cannon fodder or lab rats, the crumbs that fall from that table now are mostly poison.

Just like you're will and testament pertains to you're family, and maybe a few adopted strangers, so does the compact of this Corporate run nation, owed by a few rich Families with ties to the Crown,(legal name fraud) and the Vatican (religious fraud) in bed with the Bankers (Usery fraud) who fleece the Goyim.

Got ID? then they are fleecing you're Soul.

Let me guess. Some of your best friends are Jews.

 

[Stuu]

Available at Amazon and all good book stores, right?

Stuart

 

[Stuu]

good post

Good grief.

Stuart

 

[Jose Fly]

Except for that fact that's it's a lie.

Meh.....details, details, details....why let little things like "truth" get in the way of a good, righteous rant against science?

 

[Stuu]

Except for that fact that's it's a lie. Darwin never wrote that "many creatures had features that were "far too wondrous" to have happened by mutation processes" because Darwin wasn't aware of the role of mutation in the origins of species. Darwin was only aware of natural selection as the origin of species.

It's probably the old creationist canard of Darwin 'freely admitting' that the complexity of the eye was a daunting proposition for natural selection to explain...

...which rhetorical device he did use before going on to explain how complex things like eyes arise by natural selection.

In other words, Interplanner is quote mining, but seems unwilling even to share the quote he mined.

Stuart

 

[6days]

The flaw in evolution, that Darwin was aware of, was that many creatures had features that were "far too wondrous" to have happened by mutation processes.....

Darwin had no idea how wondrous creation really is. Its a great time to be a Christian as we are beginning to understand just how "wonderfully and marvelously made" we really are. Science continues to discover the sophisticated and complex design within our bodies.

Perhaps Darwin knew his beliefs didn't fit the evidence. Beauty and design seemed to make him sick. He said "The sight of a feather in a peacock’s tail, whenever I gaze at it, makes me sick!"

In the beginning, God created...

 

[6days]

It's probably the old creationist canard of Darwin 'freely admitting' that the complexity of the eye was a daunting proposition for natural selection to explain...

...which rhetorical device he did use before going on to explain how complex things like eyes arise by natural selection.

And science has proven just how wrong Darwin was about the eye. Our eye has a design far superior to anything that 'evolution' could create.

God's Word tells us that He created the seeing eye and the hearing ear.

 

[patrick jane]

And science has proven just how wrong Darwin was about the eye. Our eye has a design far superior to anything that 'evolution' could create.

God's Word tells us that He created the seeing eye and the hearing ear.

good post

 

[Greg Jennings]

The flaw in evolution, that Darwin was aware of, was that many creatures had features that were "far too wondrous" to have happened by mutation processes. But evolution was not about making scientific sense anyway. It was the wealthy English classes way of escaping the shame of human trafficking and of blasting the poor with white sugar diets, and of fighting back, ideologically, against the 'scandalous' US Constitution.

The Constitution positioned a Creator as the basis for human rights for all. The racism inherent in evolution (right from the title page of OS) is why the residue of racism existed in America, but it was being eliminated. This is why the Left's claims of racism today run so late and so far off the mark. The Left needs to protect anti-religion as the answer to everything the Constitution created, which they see as a failure. Except Islam. The Left is still on a euphoric blind date with it.

[This paragraph is the theme of my newest short novel DELUGE OF SUSPICIONS at Amazon.com].

I don't know you well, Interplanner. But based on your post I can conclude that you're either badly misled or disinterested in reality. I hope it's the former and not the latter