Don't have that much hair unfortunately...
www.bangordailynews.com
Well, honestly, why would anyone be worried about a gateway pundit article?
You love the genetic fallacy far too much.
Nah, just not gullible enough to buy into laughable tabloid crap.
Rejecting information simply and solely based on the source is stupid and fallacious.
The Gateway Pundit doesn't provide "information", it provides sensationalist garbage that appeals to its far right gullible readership. It's a completely discredited rag and with good reason. Those who buy into it without question must be fed up by now of how little any of its 'HUGE!' headlines have actually come to pass or thicker than whale omelettes.
Rejecting something based solely on the source is a fallacy. Only dummies use fallacious "reasoning".
Then you should really stop using it dude. Having no time for a rightfully discredited wingnut source of "news" doesn't equate to not keeping up with political events. It just requires having more discernment where it comes to getting actual news and the like.
Only those over the target catch the flak.
You are the only one that constantly "uses it".
I don't actually know much of anything about this source. But I do know blatant fallacy repeated ad nauseam. Fallacy is practically all you ever use.
Low flying aircraft would have squat to worry about where it comes to TGP then...
Well, except I don't. That's just you using the same little trope in lieu of actual argument but that's okay. I expect it along with all manner of immaturity and else with the far right.
Yes, you do it all the time.
Your constant use of fallacy is your problem.
Boy oh boy... talk about repeated tropes!
Again, an opinion with NO support whatsoever. It's clear that the one lacking knowledge about "actual fallacy" is you.
You are quite the comedian.
So again the fallacy. Great work, genius!
No, this is just you repeating the same tired stuff cos you either don't understand what a fallacy is or you're quite happy to be dishonest about stuff. It's a familiar tactic with plenty on the far right but it's amusing that you double down on it even when it's explained as to why it has no merit. TGP is a far right hack outfit with no objective journalistic credibility whatsoever and it targets a far right audience who fall for it's shtick. Hardly the only one in that regard either. I dismiss TGP as actual "news" and integrative journalism doesn't back up the ridiculous, sensationalist rubbish it routinely spoon feeds its gullible adherents. Checked it out a fair few times and it's just a joke. Like a broken clock, it might tell the right time on occasion but you'd be silly to follow the thing for the actual time of day.
That's hilarious. You commit the genetic fallacy repeatedly and yet you claim that I'm the one that does not understand "what a fallacy is". Priceless!!
Claiming that an article is false simply because of the source is THE genetic fallacy. I'm beginning to think that you are actually mentally retarded.
Regardless of your opinion of them, their articles are NOT false simply because THEY are posting it. That is THE genetic fallacy.
So, you seem to need walking through this again then. I'm not claiming that any given article in a wingnut source is false. The likelihood of their being false is most assuredly high and with sources like TGP they've practically always come to nought for sure, but that isn't the equivalent of claiming that any article they post is automatically false by association. Do you understand the difference and your mistake on the score now? Sensationalist claims and tabloid press don't generally hold up when integrative journalism undermines it all. I've followed plenty of the TGP stuff Jefferson has posted and cross checked it and it's just laughable. You're making an accusation that never held any foundation to start with and your childish "retard" stuff is only to be expected...
