"...embrace the gospel that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the righteous one, died for your sins..."
The antecedent of 'your' is unbelievers.
Please don't make Jesus' simple good news so complicated. It is a grave sin to do that.
Piper may have been preaching from the position that there could be elect listening whom the Lord had not yet quickened, in which case God could use human preaching as a tool for hearing on the specific day that particular sinner is to be awakened. [I'm not defending Calvinism, only suggesting a possible reason he preached as he did that day.]
Jesus died for everyone, but his shed blood is for the firstborn. Unbelievers do not heed his shed blood.
And grave sins will bury you. :rip:
I'm merely invoking the timeliness principle--people called at different points in time--in the parable at the beginning of Mat 2 as a possible explanation for Piper's preaching. I.e., none but God knows (from the Calvinist perspective, not mine)when or using what means He intends to awaken the elect in time. Preaching may, in this scenario, merely be the tool God uses to aid in the awakening of one or more of the elect. It's not disingenuous at all. Piper would likely assume that the non-elect wouldn't "hear" his preaching anyway, he preached in the event God might use his words to the benefit of those elected to be awakened at that particular point in time via that particular preaching. Do you see what I mean? Maybe I'm not properly representing the Calvinist position and a Calvinist will correct me here.Ok - but Piper will still be telling those whom he considers not among the elect that Jesus died for their sins. That would be disingenuous.
I'm merely invoking the timeliness principle--people called at different points in time--in the parable at the beginning of Mat 2 as a possible explanation for Piper's preaching. I.e., none but God knows (from the Calvinist perspective, not mine)when or using what means He intends to awaken the elect in time. Preaching may, in this scenario, merely be the tool God uses to aid in the awakening of one or more of the elect. It's not disingenuous at all. Piper would likely assume that the non-elect wouldn't "hear" his preaching anyway, he preached in the event God might use his words to the benefit of those elected to be awakened at that particular point in time via that particular preaching. Do you see what I mean? Maybe I'm not properly representing the Calvinist position and a Calvinist will correct me here.
the essence of the good news.
Christianity is just a game for you.
Certainly scripture teachers that Jesus shed his blood for all.
Not really, it's just that some times you are so funny.
But you do need to quit judging the faith of others.
do you know why gospel is called a good news?
Your position of pro-military says it all about your faith.
your faith is deceptive.
I asked first.
what is it?
"Who are you to judge another’s servant?" (Paul)
that we might be saved
to be more clear, God is giving all of us opportunity to be in His kingdom for eternity through Jesus Christ.