Darwin’s Monkey Theory
- Thread starter serpentdove
- Start date
lol When they get that down to 6000 they will finally have it right. Intellectual idiots amaze me some times. We have people today that can make something right now to look like it is a hundred years old. And in the beginning God made everything to appear to be billions of years old. And the intellectuals fall for it.
Last edited:
Like I say if evolution works why are there still monkeys in zoos and swinging from trees?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SonOfCaleb
Active member
At a biological level theres ZERO evidence for DNA being able to transmute itself into a totally different DNA producing a different species from the former. It simply doesnt exist. Unfortunately most Biologists have careers and a livelyhood to think about which means means notables like Dawkins are suitably incentivised financially and ideaologically to fix the evidence around their objective, which in turn requires the neccesary mental gymnastics and dissonance required to reconcile these opposing positions.
The elephant in the room which evolutionists totally ignore though is Anthropology. The oldest Anthropological evidence is just over 4000 years old. This is an empircal fact which due to the nature of Anthropology is not stymied by the inaccuracies of carbon dating techniques.
In essence the age of the civilisations -who incidentally emerged suddenly in the fossil record- is not contemporaneous with any of the suggested and more ancient dates for mankind which depending on who you speak to range from hundreds of thousands of years to millions of years. Thus according to evolution man went from an Ape and whatever species the Ape purportedly evolved from and son on to cognitive humans and civilisation with art, language, polities, religion, agriculture etc etc literally within a blink of an eye.
Quite ironic the huge leapt of faith required to believe such nonsense.
The elephant in the room which evolutionists totally ignore though is Anthropology. The oldest Anthropological evidence is just over 4000 years old. This is an empircal fact which due to the nature of Anthropology is not stymied by the inaccuracies of carbon dating techniques.
In essence the age of the civilisations -who incidentally emerged suddenly in the fossil record- is not contemporaneous with any of the suggested and more ancient dates for mankind which depending on who you speak to range from hundreds of thousands of years to millions of years. Thus according to evolution man went from an Ape and whatever species the Ape purportedly evolved from and son on to cognitive humans and civilisation with art, language, polities, religion, agriculture etc etc literally within a blink of an eye.
Quite ironic the huge leapt of faith required to believe such nonsense.
So far this thread includes:
1. Ignorance of what the theory of Evolution actually is "why are there still monkeys in zoos and swinging from trees?"
2. Ignorance of what a Scientific Theory is. "It is still "theory" a conjecture."
3. References to various Creationist sites, without any references to the actual scientific study
4. Inaccurate anthropological "facts" . "The oldest Anthropological evidence is just over 4000 years old." some ancient cultures would be quite surprised to find out that they didn't exist.
5. As suggestion that God has an interest in fooling us into think the world is much older than it actually is. "in the beginning God made everything to appear to be billions of years old.". Nice God, Squeaky!
Sorry to interfere. You can all go back to patting your own shoulders now.
Chair
1. Ignorance of what the theory of Evolution actually is "why are there still monkeys in zoos and swinging from trees?"
2. Ignorance of what a Scientific Theory is. "It is still "theory" a conjecture."
3. References to various Creationist sites, without any references to the actual scientific study
4. Inaccurate anthropological "facts" . "The oldest Anthropological evidence is just over 4000 years old." some ancient cultures would be quite surprised to find out that they didn't exist.
5. As suggestion that God has an interest in fooling us into think the world is much older than it actually is. "in the beginning God made everything to appear to be billions of years old.". Nice God, Squeaky!
Sorry to interfere. You can all go back to patting your own shoulders now.
Chair
Satan created the world?
Because you have no idea what the theory actually says.