Can the USA fight 3 simultaneous World Wars? China, Russia, Middle East?

[Nazaroo]

Many people have spoken about a world war erupting out of the Middle East.

Now, the resurrection of the Russian Empire and its vigorous and aggressive
defence if its border-buffer countries, has also challenged the hawks in
the USA strategic Command.

As if that weren't enough, now many independents are seeing China
as about to break out in a world-war with the USA, spilling over from
the economic struggle over Asia.

Thats THREE World-War Level Fronts, which a corrupt and moronic America
may find escalating into full scale violence.

The USA already seems to have invested heavily in appropriating most of
the Ukraine, something Russia perceives as an all out act of war,
and threatening its very survival.

The USA already seems to have engaged in some severe covert operations
against China, again perceived by them as war-like acts of aggression.

And the USA under the influence of the Israelis and European Banksters
has already interfered in at least a dozen Middle Eastern countries,
with a fallout and backlash that has set in motion a global mass migration
of Muslims into Europe.

Its time to ask if the gangsters who run the USA are their own worst enemy.

 

[GFR7]

They are, yes.

 

[Nick M]

Obama has been dismantling the DoD so the country is weaker on the world stage. So no, we can't fight all at once. We could nuke everybody and be done with it. I know who to hit first and where.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Obama has been dismantling the DoD so the country is weaker on the world stage. So no, we can't fight all at once. We could nuke everybody and be done with it. I know who to hit first and where.

You really are moronic beyond words. "Nuke everybody and be done with it"?! Are you honestly so utterly bloody stupid? You think you could launch a bunch of first strikes and go home and smoke your cigars and quaff your whiskeys without America and North West Europe resembling a matchbox after an elephants stood on it?

What an absolute idiot.

:dunce:

 

[Tinark]

Obama has been dismantling the DoD so the country is weaker on the world stage. So no, we can't fight all at once. We could nuke everybody and be done with it. I know who to hit first and where.

Are you calling our armed forces generally weaker than those countries? That they'd lose despite having much more funding? Also, is there some reason why our allies France, UK, Britian, Saudi Arabia, and Germany wouldn't combine with us in this wacky paranoid possibility of global war with those three countries at once?

[The US] currently spends more on defense than the next 7 countries combined.

http://pgpf.org/Chart-Archive/0053_defense-comparison

 

[Tinark]

You really are moronic beyond words. "Nuke everybody and be done with it"?! Are you honestly so utterly bloody stupid? You think you could launch a bunch of first strikes and go home and smoke your cigars and quaff your whiskeys without America and North West Europe resembling a matchbox after an elephants stood on it?

What an absolute idiot.

:dunce:

You forget that he believes this is required to get Jesus to come down from the clouds.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Are you calling our armed forces generally weaker than those countries? That they'd lose despite having much more funding? Also, is there some reason why our allies France, UK, Britian, Saudi Arabia, and Germany wouldn't combine with us in this wacky paranoid possibility of global war with those three countries at once?

http://pgpf.org/Chart-Archive/0053_defense-comparison

The guys a gormless nut. Probably thinks he's a military strategist because he plays 'Call Of Duty' on the X Box...

 

[Tinark]

The guys a gormless nut. Probably thinks he's a military strategist because he plays 'Call Of Duty' on the X Box...

I learned a new word today :thumb:

 

[ok doser]

why would we want to fight China?


russia and the Middle East make sense - there's strategic value in controlling the ME (oil) and Russia has never/will never forgo its expansionist tendencies - hence the value in keeping a strong Germany as a buffer

but China? :idunno:

 

[shagster01]

You really are moronic beyond words. "Nuke everybody and be done with it"?! Are you honestly so utterly bloody stupid? You think you could launch a bunch of first strikes and go home and smoke your cigars and quaff your whiskeys without America and North West Europe resembling a matchbox after an elephants stood on it?

What an absolute idiot.

:dunce:

It's a terrorist action Nick M supports. And he knows it. He's no better than Isis.

 

[Nick M]

So defending oneself is terrorism now? You would be hilarious if you weren't so stupid.

 

[patrick jane]

So defending oneself is terrorism now? You would be hilarious if you weren't so stupid.

yep, sometimes the best defense is great offence - military and sports

 

[patrick jane]

Are you calling our armed forces generally weaker than those countries? That they'd lose despite having much more funding? Also, is there some reason why our allies France, UK, Britian, Saudi Arabia, and Germany wouldn't combine with us in this wacky paranoid possibility of global war with those three countries at once?

http://pgpf.org/Chart-Archive/0053_defense-comparison

that's why you are safe and comfortable in your home, neighborhood and are a free American. that's why we are THE BEST !!!!!!!!!!

 

[patrick jane]

that's why you are safe and comfortable in your home, neighborhood and are a free American. that's why we are THE BEST !!!!!!!!!!

we get by with a little help from our friends -

 

[shagster01]

So defending oneself is terrorism now? You would be hilarious if you weren't so stupid.

Blowing up millions of God's innocent children is now called "defense?" You would be hilarious if you weren't so stupid.

 

[ok doser]

Blowing up millions of God's innocent children is now called "defense?" You would be hilarious if you weren't so stupid.

i suspect a war with russia, china and "the middle east" would result in more than a few cases of collateral damage

 

[shagster01]

i suspect a war with russia, china and "the middle east" would result in more than a few cases of collateral damage

That different than just nuking the whole country indiscriminately.

 

[ok doser]

That different than just nuking the whole country indiscriminately.

indeed it is - it keeps it over there instead of over here and it ends it quickly

 

[shagster01]

indeed it is - it keeps it over there instead of over here and it ends it quickly

Yes quickly, but not morally.