Biden/Harris 2020

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
yes, you were outed in the "Cuties" thread

You mean the coming of age movie you watched? No, that's not child pornography. If you couldn't keep your eyes off the girls that's your problem. The movie is sober social commentary, and apparently you couldn't handle it. That's also your problem, but it doesn't make it pornography.

Here's the writer-director in her own words:

I was at a community event in Paris a few years ago when a group of young girls came on the stage dressed and dancing in a very risque way. They were only 11 years old, and their performance was shocking. Curious to understand what was happening on that platform, I spent the next year and a half interviewing more than a hundred 10- and 11-year-old girls across the city.

The result was my movie "Mignonnes," or "Cuties" in English. I wanted to make a film in the hope of starting a conversation about the sexualization of children. The movie has certainly started a debate, though not the one that I intended.

Puberty is such a confusing time. You are still a child, with all that wonderful naivete and innocence, but your body is changing, and you're self-conscious and curious about its impact on others all at the same time.

The stories that the girls I spoke to shared with me were remarkably similar. They saw that the sexier a woman is on Instagram or TikTok, the more likes she gets. They tried to imitate that sexuality in the belief that it would make them more popular. Spend an hour on social media and you'll see preteens — often in makeup — pouting their lips and strutting their stuff as if they were grown women. The problem, of course, is that they are not women, and they don't realize what they are doing. They construct their self-esteem based on social media likes and the number of followers they have.

To see these youngsters put so much pressure on themselves so early was heartbreaking. Their insights and experiences with social media informed "Cuties."

The main character in the film is an 11-year-old girl called Amy whose family, like mine, came from Senegal and lives in Paris. Frustrated by her mother's failure to take control of her own life, Amy decides to seek freedom by joining a clique of girls at school who are preparing to enter a local dance contest and design increasingly risque routines copying what they've seen on their phones. The girls don't have the maturity, however, to realize what their gestures and dance moves look like to the audience. It is only in seeing the shock on parents' faces in the audience, and at the same time thinking of what her mother is going through, that Amy realizes that these dance routines bring no freedom at all. She chooses her own path, balancing her family's traditional roots and the more liberal city in which she lives.

Some people have found certain scenes in my film uncomfortable to watch. But if one really listens to 11-year-old girls, their lives are uncomfortable.

We, as adults, have not given children the tools to grow up healthy in our society. I wanted to open people's eyes to what's truly happening in schools and on social media, forcing them to confront images of young girls made up, dressed up and dancing suggestively to imitate their favorite pop icon. I wanted adults to spend 96 minutes seeing the world through the eyes of an 11-year-old girl, as she lives 24 hours a day. These scenes can be hard to watch but are no less true as a result. Like most 11- and 12-year-olds, our actors in the film had already seen these types of dances and more. Despite this, during filming we were extremely mindful of their age. A trained counselor was present on set. There was no nudity except for a one-second shot in which the main characters see the exposed breast of an actress over 18 while watching a video of a dance routine on a grainy mobile screen. The project was even approved by the French government's child protection authorities.

This film is my own story. All my life, I have juggled two cultures: Senegalese and French. As a result, people often ask me about the oppression of women in more traditional societies. And I always ask: But isn't the objectification of women's bodies in Western Europe and the United States another kind of oppression? When girls feel so judged at such a young age, how much freedom will they ever truly have in life?

And that's why I made "Cuties": to start a debate about the sexualization of children in society today so that maybe — just maybe — politicians, artists, parents and educators could work together to make a change that will benefit children for generations to come. It's my sincerest hope that this conversation doesn't become so difficult that it too gets caught up in today's "cancel culture."
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
doser states:
... you ... have been caught defending child pornography


anna's response?

why, to double down and defend it again :doh:
You mean the coming of age movie you watched? No, that's not child pornography. If you couldn't keep your eyes off the girls that's your problem. The movie is sober social commentary, and apparently you couldn't handle it. That's also your problem, but it doesn't make it pornography.

Here's the writer-director in her own words:

I was at a community event in Paris a few years ago when a group of young girls came on the stage dressed and dancing in a very risque way. They were only 11 years old, and their performance was shocking. Curious to understand what was happening on that platform, I spent the next year and a half interviewing more than a hundred 10- and 11-year-old girls across the city.

The result was my movie "Mignonnes," or "Cuties" in English. I wanted to make a film in the hope of starting a conversation about the sexualization of children. The movie has certainly started a debate, though not the one that I intended.

Puberty is such a confusing time. You are still a child, with all that wonderful naivete and innocence, but your body is changing, and you're self-conscious and curious about its impact on others all at the same time.

The stories that the girls I spoke to shared with me were remarkably similar. They saw that the sexier a woman is on Instagram or TikTok, the more likes she gets. They tried to imitate that sexuality in the belief that it would make them more popular. Spend an hour on social media and you'll see preteens — often in makeup — pouting their lips and strutting their stuff as if they were grown women. The problem, of course, is that they are not women, and they don't realize what they are doing. They construct their self-esteem based on social media likes and the number of followers they have.

To see these youngsters put so much pressure on themselves so early was heartbreaking. Their insights and experiences with social media informed "Cuties."

The main character in the film is an 11-year-old girl called Amy whose family, like mine, came from Senegal and lives in Paris. Frustrated by her mother's failure to take control of her own life, Amy decides to seek freedom by joining a clique of girls at school who are preparing to enter a local dance contest and design increasingly risque routines copying what they've seen on their phones. The girls don't have the maturity, however, to realize what their gestures and dance moves look like to the audience. It is only in seeing the shock on parents' faces in the audience, and at the same time thinking of what her mother is going through, that Amy realizes that these dance routines bring no freedom at all. She chooses her own path, balancing her family's traditional roots and the more liberal city in which she lives.

Some people have found certain scenes in my film uncomfortable to watch. But if one really listens to 11-year-old girls, their lives are uncomfortable.

We, as adults, have not given children the tools to grow up healthy in our society. I wanted to open people's eyes to what's truly happening in schools and on social media, forcing them to confront images of young girls made up, dressed up and dancing suggestively to imitate their favorite pop icon. I wanted adults to spend 96 minutes seeing the world through the eyes of an 11-year-old girl, as she lives 24 hours a day. These scenes can be hard to watch but are no less true as a result. Like most 11- and 12-year-olds, our actors in the film had already seen these types of dances and more. Despite this, during filming we were extremely mindful of their age. A trained counselor was present on set. There was no nudity except for a one-second shot in which the main characters see the exposed breast of an actress over 18 while watching a video of a dance routine on a grainy mobile screen. The project was even approved by the French government's child protection authorities.

This film is my own story. All my life, I have juggled two cultures: Senegalese and French. As a result, people often ask me about the oppression of women in more traditional societies. And I always ask: But isn't the objectification of women's bodies in Western Europe and the United States another kind of oppression? When girls feel so judged at such a young age, how much freedom will they ever truly have in life?

And that's why I made "Cuties": to start a debate about the sexualization of children in society today so that maybe — just maybe — politicians, artists, parents and educators could work together to make a change that will benefit children for generations to come. It's my sincerest hope that this conversation doesn't become so difficult that it too gets caught up in today's "cancel culture."



thank you for proving my point
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
There actually is a presidential candidate who was sued for sexually assaulting a child...
The first major scandal to hit the Trump campaign besides the typical “what a racist, such a sexist, yada yada yada,” came from a lawsuit stemming from the infamous sex parties held by billionaire and known pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. The woman named in the suit is Katie Johnson, who says Trump took her virginity in 1994 when she was only 13 and being held by Epstein as a slave.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/

This may come out when Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition is unsealed.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
A grand jury in Texas determined that it was

They can't determine that it was, the court does. But yes, tinyTyler Texas determined it will see its day in court based on an allegation of lewdness (not pornography, it doesn't meet the definition) which has no "“serious” artistic, literary, social, or scientific value." Should be interesting to see how it turns out.
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
They can't determine that it was, the court does. But yes, tinyTyler Texas determined it will see its day in court based on an allegation of lewdness (not pornography, it doesn't meet the definition) which has no "“serious” artistic, literary, social, or scientific value." Should be interesting to see how it turns out.

I lived in Tyler briefly. Mostly nice people. But they also had an active KKK group, and as you might know, Louie Gohmert grew up in the area, so there was always a dark underside to the town. There was almost a line drawn down a street, separating north Tyler (black) from south Tyler (white). The public schools were so bad, most of the wealthy Protestants sent their kids to the Catholic high school.

When we registered my oldest son in school there, the school secretary took it upon herself to put him in the remedial class (without telling us) because "he tawked funny." When Mrs. Barbarian found out, there was hell to pay; it was federally funded and they had completely ignored the rules for participation. The principal apologized, but we knew we had to get out of that hole.

But my middle son learned to read in kindergarten. At parents night, we told the teacher how happy we were that Mike could read so early. She had no idea. It was complete news to her.

The soccer association was completely white until I formed a team. My assistant coach and several kids were black. It was a small scandal, and a lot of talk about how unfair it was because we won a lot.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
I lived in Tyler briefly. Mostly nice people. But they also had an active KKK group, and as you might know, Louie Gohmert grew up in Tyler, so there was always a dark underside to the town. There was almost a line drawn down a street, separating north Tyler (black) from south Tyler (white). The public schools were so bad, most of the wealthy Protestants sent their kids to the Catholic high school.

We were faced with that choice when my oldest was entering middle school and we lived in the city. God provided the opportunity to move to the suburbs and my kids flourished in the same schools I had attended and was teaching in.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
No, you defame a good man by implying or outright calling him a pedo, you defame me by saying I defend child pornography which is an abject lie. You think about pedophilia a lot, apparently, unlike the people you defame. You're a sick man, seek help.

Anybody who knows you and with an IQ above 12 knows that you've never defended child pornography or support it in the slightest. Only thick little trolls would even venture down that retarded little route. So pay no heed.

:cheers:
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
I lived in Tyler briefly. Mostly nice people. But they also had an active KKK group, and as you might know, Louie Gohmert grew up in the area, so there was always a dark underside to the town. There was almost a line drawn down a street, separating north Tyler (black) from south Tyler (white). The public schools were so bad, most of the wealthy Protestants sent their kids to the Catholic high school.

When we registered my oldest son in school there, the school secretary took it upon herself to put him in the remedial class (without telling us) because "he tawked funny." When Mrs. Barbarian found out, there was hell to pay; it was federally funded and they had completely ignored the rules for participation. The principal apologized, but we knew we had to get out of that hole.

But my middle son learned to read in kindergarten. At parents night, we told the teacher how happy we were that Mike could read so early. She had no idea. It was complete news to her.

The soccer association was completely white until I formed a team. My assistant coach and several kids were black. It was a small scandal, and a lot of talk about how unfair it was because we won a lot.

Great post but one minor and possibly pedantic aside...it's football, not soccer!

::eek:
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Soccer is for homos.

You really are several sandwiches short of an interesting lunch, aren't you Tripe? Football is the prevailing sport around the world you silly little dipstick. What's the matter? Never had any aptitude for it? Eh, me neither. Get a grip and stop acting like such an arse.

:up:
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
[Soccer] is the prevailing sport around the world.

Darwinists can't help themselves. Their No. 1 argument is always how popular their ideas are.

:mock: Popular sports played by homos.

Try going to Otara and talking about "football." Try going to Dublin and doing it. Try Melbourne. Now Texas.

:mock: Insulated Chelsea-loving homos.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Darwinists can't help themselves. Their No. 1 argument is always how popular their ideas are.

:mock: Popular sports played by homos.

Try going to Otara and talking about "football." Try going to Dublin and doing it. Try Melbourne. Now Texas.

:mock: Insulated Chelsea-loving homos.

Wow, there really is something unhinged with you isn't there? Pointing out that football is the prevailing sport around the world popularity wise shouldn't provoke any such reaction with someone without some sort of issues going on. It's simply stating fact. Heck, it's not my favourite sport by a fair bit but I can still acknowledge as to why it happens to be so overall.Your "homo" stuff?!

Get some help.

:
 
Top