Yikes ! Anyone who could accuse Ben Carson of having "Marxist " ideas does not even know what Marxism is ...
A broken clock is right twice a day (De Horn just has to say something intelligent a 2nd time to live up to that saying).
Yikes ! Anyone who could accuse Ben Carson of having "Marxist " ideas does not even know what Marxism is ...
wacko
What are 'user fees'?
And what's the one fair tax you mentioned?
A broken clock is right twice a day (De Horn just has to say something intelligent a 2nd time to live up to that saying).
Amazing when one sees the Marxist in a person agreeing with the Marxist of another.
Right, but can you explain what services the users would be paying for?Um, the standard definition of a user and a fee would suffice.
It's the Medicare tax. It's flat across the board, 2.9 % to everyone regardless of income.
It currently costs $30 to enter Yellowstone National Park in a private, non-commercial vehicle.What are 'user fees'?
We know you are. What's your plan without taking from one to give to another? Or do you even have a plan? Oh wait...vote Republican.
It currently costs $30 to enter Yellowstone National Park in a private, non-commercial vehicle.
It currently costs $350 to file a lawsuit in a Federal court.
Those are "user fees".
Right, but can you explain what services the users would be paying for?
So if Carson took this part:
To protect those rising from poverty, the flat tax applies only to income above 150 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). For example, a family of four will not pay the 14.9 percent tax on their first $36,375 of income.
out of his tax plan you'd consider it fair?
OK, whenever you're game.Snip for another time.
I'm confused now. You said the medicare tax was fair because it was the same percent for everyone. If you take that part out of Carson's plan you'd have a percentage tax that's the same for everyone, wouldn't you? How exactly are you defining fairness?How can anyone think this is fair is beyond me.
OK, whenever you're game.
I'm confused now. You said the medicare tax was fair because it was the same percent for everyone. If you take that part out of Carson's plan you'd have a percentage tax that's the same for everyone, wouldn't you? How exactly are you defining fairness?
The numbers don't lie KMO. The medicare tax is the fairest of the current taxes imposed by the Federal Government.
We are going by what Carson says correct? According to HIS plan, if you make less than $36,375 you pay $0 correct?
So if you pay $0, and if AcW pays $14,900 (14.9%) Or $9,480.13 if we deduct the $36,375 from the $100,000 he makes, how is that fair?
You seem to be misunderstanding my question. I'm saying take the part in bold OUT of his plan.
Ok, let's do that then....
Based on this example then KMO at $25,000 and ACW at $100,000 at the same 14.9 % rate is as follows
KMO would pay $3,725.00 in income flat tax
AcW would pay $14,900 in income flat tax.
Would you call that fair?
Not a chance in hell.
:doh: Then what makes a tax fair to you?
What difference do you see between that and the 2.9 medicare tax you mentioned?
Is it just that Carson's tax is too high?
There is no such thing as a fair tax.
None really. Just the medicare tax is as they say. Fair (if that is even the right word to use) across the board.
It is high for sure.
so you weren't even saying that the medicare tax was fair. Now I understand.