Atheist Sues Pastor for Inviting Mayor, Council Members to Ground Breaking for Church

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
Atheist Sues Pastor for Inviting Mayor, Council Members to Ground Breaking for Church Cross Project

CORPUS CHRISTI — A professing atheist has filed a lawsuit against a Texas pastor for allegedly violating the law for inviting the city mayor and council members to the ground breaking ceremony for his church’s project to build what it is heralded as being the largest cross in the Western Hemisphere.

Patrick Greene of San Antonio filed suit on March 8 against Rick Milby with Abundant Life Fellowship in Corpus Christi, asserting that the pastor violated the Texas Constitution by showing preference to the Christian religion.

Abundant Life Fellowship is the midst of its plan to build a 230-foot cross along Interstate 37 in Corpus Christi. The land is owned by the congregation and the project is being funded by private donations.

Because Milby invited Corpus Christi (Latin for “Body of Christ”) Mayor Nelda Martinez, along with Council Members Lucy Rubio and Carolyn Vaughn to attend the ground breaking in January, Greene filed suit against the pastor for the co-mingling of God and government.

“When I saw the mayor in her official position and the council in their official positions were attending a groundbreaking ceremony for a Christian symbol—that smacked right in the face of the Constitution of the state of Texas,” Greene told Fox reporter Todd Starnes.

He is expected to add Martinez, Rubio and Vaughn to his legal challenge for attending.

“It’s ridiculous. He’s attacking my rights and the rights of the mayor,” Milby told Starnes. “The groundbreaking was on a Sunday, and these are Christians, and they have a right to their faith.”

Martinez told reporters that the cross held personal meaning as her father had long desired for such a structure to be built on the bay.

“The name of our city is Body of Christ, and I will tell you I will never forget that conversation I had with my father about his dream and his hope,” she explained to the Corpus Christi Caller Times. “No matter what belief you have, this is the name of our city and it was my constitutional right to attend. I will never regret being there for this wonderful moment.”

City Attorney Miles Risley agrees with Martinez and believes that Greene is misinterpreting the law—that the mayor and city council could legally attend of their own volition if they desired.

Attorney Jeremy Dys of First Liberty in Plano made similar remarks, stating that government officials who identify as Christian shouldn’t be punished for attending Christian services.

“This guy is trying to use the legal system to ban city council people from attending any type of church service,” he said. “To get the court to admonish them for daring to go to a church service is just wrong.”

Greene, who lives nearly 150 miles away from the cross structure, has also complained about the concept of the project altogether, calling it “tacky” and a distraction to drivers.

“Church property or not, the [pastor] showed incredibly poor judgment in putting it where everybody can see it—just because he wants to proselytize his faith and get converts,” he said.

Greene’s lawsuit only pertains to government attendance to the ground breaking ceremony and not any safety concerns.

Atheists are chomping at the bit these days to the extreme of ridiculousness.
 

kmoney

New member
Hall of Fame
Because Milby invited Corpus Christi (Latin for “Body of Christ”) Mayor Nelda Martinez, along with Council Members Lucy Rubio and Carolyn Vaughn to attend the ground breaking in January, Greene filed suit against the pastor for the co-mingling of God and government.

“When I saw the mayor in her official position and the council in their official positions were attending a groundbreaking ceremony for a Christian symbol—that smacked right in the face of the Constitution of the state of Texas,” Greene told Fox reporter Todd Starnes.

What does 'in their official positions' mean? Did they act or do anything during the ground-breaking?
 

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
According to atheists, they never have attacked Christians. Ever.

Those lawsuits on schools, restaurants, private owners, students, and so on?
Well, it never happened, and neither did this. It's all made up.

:plain:
 

rexlunae

New member
According to atheists, they never have attacked Christians. Ever.

Not true.

Those lawsuits on schools, restaurants, private owners, students, and so on?
Well, it never happened, and neither did this. It's all made up.

A lot of them are quite justified. A lot of Christians don't know how to practice their religions without imposing them on others. This lawsuit appears to be the exception.
 

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
A lot of them are quite justified.

No they aren't. It's all in the due nature of attacking Christianity and nothing more. A person who disagrees is just dishonest defending those ridiculous shenanigans.

Shameless atheists with nothing else better to do.
 

fool

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
What does 'in their official positions' mean? Did they act or do anything during the ground-breaking?

Even if they were there in their official capacity the Church is Developing a property and it's appropriate for them to go if they want.
I wouldn't have a problem with the mayor going to a Mosque ground breaking or a liquor store or a whore house.
Sometimes they give out chrome plated shovels you get to keep and who doesn't want one of those?
 

rexlunae

New member
No they aren't. It's all in the due nature of attacking Christianity and nothing more.

I've got no problem with attacking Christianity or any other religion, as long as the attack is warranted and proportionate. But as a member of a religious minority, representing less than 5% of the population, religious freedom is a top-shelf priority for me, and filing lawsuits against valid religious expression only hurts that cause.

A person who disagrees is just dishonest defending those ridiculous shenanigans.

There's a difference between suing public officials who, in their private lives, participate in religion, and suing to prevent the use of public resources to advance a religious cause. If you can't see the distinction, I doubt you are capable of respecting or understanding what religious freedom is in the first place.
 

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
There's a difference between suing public officials who, in their private lives, participate in religion, and suing to prevent the use of public resources to advance a religious cause. If you can't see the distinction, I doubt you are capable of respecting or understanding what religious freedom is in the first place.

Thomas Jefferson would roll over in his grave if he heard you atheists dare spout that nonsense, talking about 'religious freedom'- OH WHATEVER!

Passing a portrait of Jesus is not a violation thereof. Refusing to bake a cake for a gay couple is not a violation thereof. A political figure going to a church is not a violation thereof.

What you all are doing is trying to abuse the law to attack Christians, and hiding behind some ridiculous guise that it's legal and therefore right.

YOU all are the one's who COMPLETELY incapable of respecting anything of religion, it is all a facade and you know. Go on somewhere with that :wave:
 

Ktoyou

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
I've got no problem with attacking Christianity or any other religion, as long as the attack is warranted and proportionate. But as a member of a religious minority, representing less than 5% of the population, religious freedom is a top-shelf priority for me,

what do you mean?
 

Ktoyou

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
I wouldn't have a problem with the mayor going to a Mosque ground breaking or a liquor store or a whore house.
Sometimes they give out chrome plated shovels you get to keep and who doesn't want one of those?
I wouldn't have any problem going to a bonfire of any of these. even without the shovel gift.
 
Top