I can play your stupid little game too:
What is ultra-dispensationalism?
"The greatest problem with ultra-dispensationalism is not its teaching about when the church began but the many other errors that come from its approach to Scripture. For example, at the heart of most forms of ultra-dispensationalism is the belief that Paul preached a different gospel from what the other apostles taught. Other false doctrines common in some forms of ultra-dispensationalism include soul sleep and annihilationism. Still others proclaim a brand of universalism that grants salvation even to Satan himself. Without a doubt, whatever name ultra-dispensationalism goes by, it is a dangerous error that almost always leads to other, even worse errors."
HERE
You missed.
I posted the words of your own.
Feel free to answer your own's assertions about what your own hold to.
Ironside was proven having made up what he wrote against Mid-Acts - he was proven so back when he first wrote his lies...
True, some Mads now assert some errors held by Welch and Bullinger.
That is what some of these very Mads on TOL are miffed at me for pointing it out.
It is why they no longer support my posts (they'll come running now; as they, like you; live for conflict).
Very few Mads hold their views on those things.
Your problem is your own one-sided, one size fits all, even as you take issue with being referred to as a Preterist, though you assert you are a Partial Preterist.
Its called "a (bitter) taste of your own medicine."
