It's time for all Christians to get their kids out of public schools as they are being indoctrinated into socialism and evil in those schools. If you love your kids do what is right for them.
This isn't the real problem. Teachers, by the fact of what they do, have many more hours in the day to influence a child's thinking patterns, and in many instances, more influence than a parent has even when the parents are paying close attention to what the child is being taught. That leads to the issue of a Christian's children being influenced more by the corrupt school system they send them to than by the kid's own parents.If parents don't teach their children about sex, someone else will.
This isn't the real problem. Teachers, by the fact of what they do, have many more hours in the day to influence a child's thinking patterns, and in many instances, more influence than a parent has even when the parents are paying close attention to what the child is being taught. That leads to the issue of a Christian's children being influenced more by the corrupt school system they send them to than by the kid's own parents.
Think about how hostile public education is to Biblical teachings, and the kids are having this shoved down their throats in a deceptive fashion every day at school. It affects them intellectually and emotionally. The emotional manipulation is even more dangerous than the intellectual manipulation because emotions are often more influential than intellectual manipulation as emotions run many people's thinking. The socialists here as prime evidence.
No. Parents are still the primary influencer of children - either by being there or not being there. A teacher has their time divided among multiple children - in large districts 25 or more. Teachers still call the parent for help because parents do have more control over the behavior of children than you think.This isn't the real problem. Teachers, by the fact of what they do, have many more hours in the day to influence a child's thinking patterns, and in many instances, more influence than a parent has even when the parents are paying close attention to what the child is being taught. That leads to the issue of a Christian's children being influenced more by the corrupt school system they send them to than by the kid's own parents.
It depends on the school district. If a society is hostile to biblical teachings, why would the schools be different?Think about how hostile public education is to Biblical teachings, and the kids are having this shoved down their throats in a deceptive fashion every day at school.
I think people become socialist for entirely different reasons. Many are duped into believing the government is good. They say the pledges every day, their parents tell them how great certain policemen are, they are encouraged to join the military and "fight for their country", they are told they are able to worship God because of how great the government is, etc. They have a little medical problem, lose their job, or "fail" in life and now they get sucked into the socialist trap.The emotional manipulation is even more dangerous than the intellectual manipulation because emotions are often more influential than intellectual manipulation as emotions run many people's thinking. The socialists here as prime evidence.
No. Parents are still the primary influencer of children
Not one thread by a leftist describing how they thought the election of Biden would improve the lives of Americans - not one. Hey, I couldn't even find a post.
Only if the parents decide to take a back-seat which is not uncommon.In the early years. As kids get older, their primary influence is from their peers.
See. Still doesn't care about anyone. She just wants to see people suffer.Weren't you the one who thought you knew TH well enough by looking at a handful of his posts?
I think you're laboring under the assumption that anyone left of center here thinks a defense of Biden would bring a reasonable response from anyone on the right. There is no meeting across the chasm, it's too late.
Only if the parents decide to take a back-seat which is not uncommon.
See. Still doesn't care about anyone. She just wants to see people suffer.
You mean the 70-year-old woman who lives with her cats? No, I'm talking about those under 18. And the parents have as much influence over their children as they have desired to have.Parents sometimes overestimate how much influence they have over their older children.
You are completely clueless ditto-head who has repeatedly shown an inability to read. I don't feel sorry for the willfully ignorant.You have a reading comprehension problem. I'm sorry for you.![]()
I mean old enough to be around their peers for a good portion of the day. As in, grade school and above.You mean the 70-year-old woman who lives with her cats? No, I'm talking about those under 18. And the parents have as much influence over their children as they have desired to have.
You are completely clueless ditto-head who has repeatedly shown an inability to read. I don't feel sorry for the willfully ignorant.
Of course parents should let their kids out of their sight. That's what sub-dermal transmitters are for.I mean old enough to be around their peers for a good portion of the day. As in, grade school and above.
And no, parents often think they do, but they don't. Unless they're over-controlling authoritarians who don't let their children out of their sight.
Thank you!You're such a sweetheart!![]()
Of course parents should let their kids out of their sight. That's what sub-dermal transmitters are for.
Most parents disappear after elementary school. This is why you think they have no influence - because most parents give up their influence. Just look at PTA/PTO attendance. It speaks volumes about most parents - they don't have follow-through.
Thank you!![]()