Search results

What you wrote, here, is why you don't want to answer the questions I asked you. If you answer that Yes, God is a worker/God works, you know how inconvenient it will be for you that you call God merely "worker" having already called Jesus "master worker".🤣

@Servant1: <NO ANSWER> @Servant1: <NO ANSWER> Answer these questions, weasel, or I'll put you on IGNORE for being a lying troll.

What's and where's "the bible well" and how do you "know" it?🤪🤠🤯😱🤡👺🐽

I asked you: You wrote: Is that a Yes or a No? Answer the question, weasel: Did Jehovah work? Yes or No? Then why did you bring up Proverbs 8:22 -- "The Lord possessed me [Wisdom] in the beginning of his way, before his works of old" -- to tell me that what is meant by the Hebrew behind...

Are you seriously trying to say that Wisdom was created? That would be you saying that God did not always have Wisdom. It would be you saying God was not always wise.

...........................

Why didn't you say Jehovah didn't work? Did Jehovah work? Yes or No?

Which things? Are you saying Jehovah did not work?

You certainly seem to be!

When did the head of "the Church" begin calling himself "the Bishop of Rome"? Before then, did he just call himself "the Bishop"? I Googled "why don't romanists like to be called roman catholics". One of the pages given by the search was a Quora thread, Some Roman Catholics don't like to be...

Then answer the question I asked you, weasel: Remember what you said to me, hypocrite: I give you the benefit of the doubt, taking that to be you advertising that it is your policy to read all of what your critic/questioner has posted, pursuant to "And as ye would that men should do to you...

Observe this irrelevant thing you wrote: You'd have actually had something to gripe about, had I only quoted this much of it: and left off this bit of it: But I didn't do that. Beyond the superficial commonality in the bare fact of my use of excerption, what I did do is not like that, and...

So, for you to say is for you to say (and vice versa)? Yet, God's works are not God, right? And God is not His works, right? Why, then, would you bring up things that aren't God, saying that you can see them, when you are being questioned as to why you said both "I can see God" and "I cannot...

You don't even know what contradiction is. You'll grumble about my pointing out of this fact, yet you will act in accordance with it by not being able to respond rationally to my request for you to describe exactly what you mean whenever you call something "a contradiction". I read what you...

Does it provide you with an answer to the question @JudgeRightly asked you? Yes or No? So far, your failure to answer the question asked you by @JudgeRightly -- your loud silence toward it -- is the equivalent of you providing a NO in answer the question, "Does it provide you with an answer to...

Obviously you deem the site worthless for the purpose of furnishing an answer to the question @JudgeRightly asked you. If you had an answer, you'd answer. The fact that you don't answer shows you have no answer to give, and the fact that you have no answer to give shows you did not get an...

What man says that sincerely to another man? Either you are being sarcastic or you are effeminate.

Oh, and also, you're a vicious liar, as you show by writing this: You know you weren't suggesting I were adorable, so you are lying through your teeth by saying that you were suggesting that. You know you were using your word, "adorable", in sarcasm, rather than in sincerity. It's not that...

Teeth-gnasher, why can you never refrain from your impulse to react angrily like that? I mean, I understand what it is that angers you about what I wrote; but, man, it's like you are afflicted with a sort of chronic emotional intemperance that pretty much guarantees that you are going to...