Search results

Advocating for a theocracy with its attendant brutality is a far cry from advocating violence on living people here and now.

Here in America, a good number of media personalities in TV, movies, Broadway, comedy, articles are promoting violence. Members of the liberal education establishment are too as are members of the government at all levels. It's also widespread on social media. You never hear any of run of the...

If everyone's standard of living rises because of an economic system, why is it intolerable if that same system causes gaps in levels of income? The organization for economic and cooperation (OECD) issued a report with the following quote: "Fiscal redistribution through taxes and transfers...

Don't quit your day job. You're no good at mind reading.

Yeah......Town is only speaking to liberal, race conscious blacks who typically wallow in rage and resentment.

They have only hatred for the country they grew up in but love the country they want to transform into.

Exactly. Much more articulate than me. It's exactly what I wanted to say but lacked the ability

You call being logical as nutty. That makes you the nut.

Not all the world's blacks were affected by government actions post 1964. To say blacks were affected so and so is a false statement. Aborigines and other blacks around the world were not affected in any way, so your statements concerning blacks is blatantly false. To demand that I use...

I don't care about what blacks want to be called in this country? Not true. I will call them black when speaking to them or in their presence. What I do in other settings is none of their business. Any demands on my language apart from their presence is fascistic.

We were not speaking of my preference.....but theirs. There is nothing for them to care about because there is no preference on my part. The preference or rather demand is all on them......or rather the fascists among them.

If a group of African Americans demand I use the term black even when they are not around....then they are fascists and racists too.

You are the one who is making race the determining factor in how you speak about them, not me. I will use black when speaking about African Americans when they are present and may be offended by the term African American. Now, in our conversation, you were referring to African Americans as...

Again, you are not talking to a black person. What they prefer to be called is irrelevant in your conversation with me.

I'm not black and so address them by their proper name. We are speaking of descendants of slaves..... not just any black skinned person on the planet.

They had freedom before 1964, so you even have that idea wrong.

It's funny you mention paternalistic. You're view is the paternalistic one. We even have different meanings of words or youre mind is so twisted it views my opinion as paternalistic.

By the way there are many different "blacks" in the world. You equate that generic term with the more specific term African Americans.

Yes

You're the daft one if you think African Americans were better off after 1964. I guess you have a different standard of measure. If that list isn't more important to you than the supposed gains of legislation post 1964, then we have the exact reason why this country is so screwed up and it...