Search results

There's plenty of women who can take care of themselves and as before, if a woman wants to get married and have as you describe, then absolutely fine.

You've taken that Paul quote and reduced it to something that wouldn't remotely apply to a myriad settings in the present. In your "utopia", people would starve if they weren't working even if willing and able and those who couldn't would be reliant on family and friends never mind their ability...

Because you say so?

Um, not necessarily at all. Your paradigm isn't one that would suit all women and your latter is just arrogant bunk.

It's only "better" if that's what a woman wants. Otherwise, is that hard for you to handle?

Um, yeah, cos the CDC works on listening to opinion as oppose to accumulating and extrapolating data and formulating guidance on the results that such findings bring about while under continual scrutiny etc. Good. I ain't.

And yet another irony meter goes into the clouds...

Alert the CDC, I'm sure they'd love to hear from you.

Well, considering you've stated that a woman isn't obliged to get married then one with a child isn't obliged to do so either, is she?

Oh dear, what is it with the far right that desperately seem to want to paint the opposition as "gay"? It's just laughable...also pathetic.

Because you're a scientific expert where it comes to pandemics and effective measures to curtail the spread? Nope. Go follow some more rubbish like "We Are Paul Revere" JR.

Total bunk. Trump lost. Conspiracy rubbish will flow for a while yet but eventually will fall down the drain and possibly into a swamp which would be ironic.

What do you profess yourself to be?

"Stupid" certainly applies here ironically.

Well, bring it to the table then because otherwise, there isn't any substantial evidence whatsoever and Trump just lost the election. There's plenty crackpot claims and the like but as you must surely be aware, that doesn't constitute evidence. The majority of the American people didn't want...

Of course it isn't true and that wasn't what I was saying or implying anyway. Way to bloviate though.

There's plenty in the Bible that shows how the poor in society should be catered for and if you support measures that would deny provision for them then you might as well deny crumbs to folk yourself.

There isn't any overwhelming evidence to the contrary. You just don't want to accept that.

There was no "clear evidence" of voter fraud whatsoever and the likes of Powell and Giuliani are facing lawsuits in excess of a billion dollars because of their claims. There was no proof for any of it. Heck, Clinton didn't act like such a drama queen when it was clear that she'd lost in 2016...

There's a difference between an outright refusal to work where a tribal commune would depend on people pulling their weight and modern society where there's no such thing as full employment and those who are simply unable to. Context doesn't seem to be a strong point with those who continually...