Search results

Fine. At the same time, there's no reason to take baseless allegations of fraud seriously if there's nothing of substance to support such claims. As is the case here.

Covering up for fraud of any sort would amount to such. As I've stated before, if there was any tangible evidence of such fraud then as much as I'm no fan of Trump, it should be brought to light and those responsible for perverting the results be brought to justice and held accountable. That...

If that's the 'strength' of your argument then you have no idea whether someone has won any election or not regardless of party or candidate. Otherwise, I certainly do have an 'idea' as to who won the last election and it assuredly wasn't Trump. Powell and Giuliani can be dismissed easily enough...

Yep, that still won't stop some from buying into fraud conspiracy rubbish unfortunately...

If you understood how the peer review process actually works you wouldn't have written this.

Oh please, even Fox News & Newsmax had the sense to back away from Vote machine fraud allegations when threatened with legal action. It comes to something when even Tucker Carlson lost patience with Powell in regards to that.

People are calling it conspiracy bunk because that's exactly what it is. If you think your hyperbole in regards to democrats doesn't apply to plenty of republicans in turn then you're just buying into your own false narrative.

The truth is that there was no such thing, it's just a wild conspiracy theory concocted by the far right that has nothing in support. All of these cries of fraud have come to precisely nothing because they were baseless to start with. Even Trump's lawyers stopped short of claiming actual fraud...

Well, he is, completely.

Yeah, that wasn't exactly calm, I'll grant you that.

So, is it okay as a matter of policy for other police officers to use the same restraining methods on suspects while having armed support on standby? Otherwise, you haven't answered any such thing and have shied away from it continually, for whatever reason.

You haven't answered this on point even the once. If Chauvin was by himself and had to use extreme restraining measures in order to protect himself and others from potential harm then a case can be made that subduing Floyd via kneeling on his neck could be justified in order to incapacitate...

Hmm, a twitter account over the National Academy Of Sciences... Nah, the twitter account has to have the goods...

He lost the election full stop. There's nothing credible to support these outlandish fraud allegations and you're free to buy into them as you will, it doesn't make them any the more credible however. Mike Lindell aka 'My Pillow Guy'?! He is out to lunch and then some.

In actual fact it was an unfair comparison to make in regards to your posts anyway as Rod Serling often had some very salient points to make within the series that would satirise the likes of your own, so my bad on the score.

Neither were you unless you were part of the onlookers? Else, you once again fail to address how it was possibly justifiable for Chauvin to kneel on Floyd's neck for nine minutes where he posed no threat as he had colleagues who were armed right there with him at the scene.

That would apply to you in turn on here. I note that you still haven't addressed how it was seemingly all okay for Chauvin to kneel on a man's neck for nine minutes while he had no reason to, namely the fact that he had armed colleagues right there with him. The police aren't above the law...

Twilight zone opinion is not equivalent to fact.

None at all in fact, daily or otherwise. Even ostriches would balk at the election fraud conspiracies...

I doubt Russia would have him...