Search results

He seems to feel the need to for some reason. Then again, I've come to expect this garbage so kinda water off a ducks back so to speak. :)

It's just...bonkers... https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/may/06/arizona-republicans-bamboo-ballots-audit-2020

Oh good grief...

Well, no, they aren't. All of these fraud allegations have come to nothing, simple as. There's already been recounts that surprise surprise, showed no widespread fraud. The ongoing here is just pathetic.

I claim such because I'm not and your conspiratorial opinions on the score mean absolute squat.

There was no substance to fraud allegations to begin with so of course I'm not claiming that democrats are or have been obligated in any way to defend against unfounded bunk. It's been six months since the election results and the situation with Arizona is a complete farce. Many Republicans...

And that's a claim that can be dismissed unless there's credible evidence to substantiate the allegation to start with and the onus is on you to supply that. Those who disagree with you on the score aren't obliged to do anything.

Look, if you accuse someone of something then the onus isn't on the person to prove their innocence but rather on you to establish their guilt. Anyone can cry fraud as Trump did. It's another thing altogether to substantiate it and his own team had ample opportunity to bring such to court if...

The situation in Arizona is a farce. Even plenty Republicans aren't in favour of what's going on.

If there was any evidence of fraud then sure, it should be investigated. As it stands, there isn't any evidence and just a lot of sour grapes from the former president on down because he lost.

The onus is on those who are shouting fraud to have something substantial to back up those claims. Otherwise, all said allegations have come to nothing besides law suits directed at those who've pushed false claims.

Well, I don't kowtow to any sort of group mentality without question but then proper research involves scrutinising sources that don't fit into a confirmation bias.

Nope.

Prove it. Otherwise this is just yet more bluster.

There's been ample opportunity for Trump's lawyers to present any such evidence in court and they backed off from crossing that threshold.

Well, no, that's simply not the case. The majority of Americans voted for Biden and you're entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts.

The onus isn't on me to prove such, that would be the remit of those who levelled the accusation of fraud to start with and summarily failed to substantiate it.

Anyone with a sensible mind wouldn't be prone to such subjective hyperbole. As I've already stated, I've no issue with investigations or any such fraud being uncovered had there been any. You can convince yourself that Trump was swindled out of winning or some such as you may, it doesn't make it...

I do no such thing. Where on earth have I claimed anything remotely resembling? I've pointed out to you that the allegations of fraud have been baseless which isn't the same thing at all.

Hardly.