Search results

These days Republicans don't have much choice but to be embarrassed...

I reckon everyone sane would support there being a cure for cancer along with dementia and other horrid diseases. It's not an 'either/or' as Alate was trying to point out in her thread. Where it comes to 'creationism' then it's not science. It flies in the face of how the scientific method...

Lon, Alate went into painstaking detail on the score throughout that thread. She showed that there isn't any need for cognitive dissonance in accepting evolution and having faith and she even described her own crisis of faith on the matter having once been a YEC-er herself. Thankfully she threw...

Um, nope.

No, it's based on factual evidence but I can see how you confuse the two.

They were indeed, a pleasure to read. :)

Um, okay, if you're going to suggest that there's no evidence for evolution then that's just flat out silly JR, of course there is. Scientific theories don't come about on some sort of whim, anything but. "Evolutionary biologists have continued to study various aspects of evolution by forming...

The blame squarely lies with the MAGA crowd as evidenced with the arrests. They were hardly 'civilized' people.

Sorry Lon but that isn't true: https://theologyonline.com/threads/i-love-jesus-and-i-accept-evolution.48837/post-1720728

Lon, I'm not going to go into this point by point as there's enough already and anna's probably fed up of the tangents that this thread has gone in as it is. Evolution does not mean that there isn't a creator so it's moot. Remember Alate One & Barbarian?

There is no "lack of evidence" for evolution. Do you understand how the scientific method actually works? If the evidence didn't support it it wouldn't be a theory, it's as simple as that. The reason why it's established is because of the evidence. Like anything else in science, if it doesn't...

Hmm, well, for starters scientific theories come into being because of the evidence that supports them, not a lack thereof and certainly not actual evidence that contradicts postulations. That's how science works. The reason why the theory of evolution is established is because of the plethora...

Okay, I'm not going to go into this point by point because it's gotten long winded enough as it is and would just be repetition effectively. I'll just make a statement and you can address it or not as you see fit. The theory of evolution is not 'false' because it only 'contradicts' a certain...

So, more embarrassment for Republicans then...

I will do because there was nothing there, like the 'emperor's new clothes' if you will...:) Sure it is. One guy's subjective opinion based on his own understanding and his own interpretation of the Bible. Again, ten a penny and easily spotted. You've told me why you think such is theft and...

Nah, Obama was a far better president. Probably why he served two terms in office and didn't get twice impeached.

Harrison certainly had some dislikeable characteristics but he probably still accomplished more in a month than Trump managed in four years...

Hmm, for once, your formatting seems to have gone a bit askew mid post but no matter. I'll address point by point. There was no 'whoosh' JR, just a bit of unintentional irony on your part. A bit like the time you asked me why I used so many words when I'd replied with a single sentence and you...

Then explain what this 'whoosh' supposedly comprised of, should be interesting. Um, no, it's subjective, just the same as if someone on the 'left' had constructed similar with different gradients. Which it isn't. A differing political view isn't 'evil' simply because it doesn't correspond...

There was no "whoosh" JR. Of course I can assert it, because it isn't objective. Classifying a differing political view as "evil" is broadcasting subjective bias, I doubt Enyart is particularly shy about it. If someone concocted a similar chart with conservatism as 'evil' then that again would...