Search results

What evidence? If it makes it any easier, what credible evidence? By 'credible' I mean sources that aren't out and out wingnut and dingbat sites etc that can be corroborated and verified for veracity.

If that's what you gleaned from AO's thread then you really weren't paying attention to it. Science itself is entirely neutral on the topic of evolution. It didn't come about by atheistic philosophy by way of. The theory became established because of the abundance of evidence that supports it...

More clueless...

What evidence?

No and neither did Alate. Grow up.

The thread in question was about evolution so in context there was nothing wrong with AO's statement. This is kinda lame RD.

No, it isn't as you can familiarize yourself with by looking up the definition. Even the philosophical definition doesn't hold up. Sure, science is involved in areas besides the physical so no limiting going on here. It depends on the branch.

That still isn't "materialism". What else is science involved in, the supernatural?

Nobody stole the election from him. He just lost. Get over it already.

I read it the first time. That isn't "materialism".

Trump managed his own removal from office by himself. If he hadn't been so obsessed with twitter, his own gargantuan ego and acted like his a president who was actually fit for office, he might just still be there.

Your claims can be dismissed accordingly.

Your misguided opinion is not "fact".

It really wasn't and I'm not interested in downplaying anything. I thoroughly enjoyed reading her detailed analysis and debunking of ignorance but if I carry on on that score I'll be accused of 'hero worship' again? Her scientific expertise and knowledge were simply a pleasure to read. By all...

Hardly a 'materialistic' view and if that's the best you've got given the absolute minutiae of detail she went into in that thread then... Hey, again, stick with your young earth belief. What does it ultimately matter?

Funnily enough, I decided to read through the thread in question earlier for the last coupla hours: https://theologyonline.com/threads/i-love-jesus-and-i-accept-evolution.48837/ I'm not even interested in our own occasional spats on it as neither of us IMO fare very well but so much more in...

No, that's just you resorting to the same, tired shtick. Get some new material.

The threads still there and oh yes, there were several instances and not just you to be fair but others also. The ToE isn't a "belief system" and you don't have any "evidence", credible at least to refute it. You just seem to be shackled to one of your own that denies actual science in favour...

If only. All you seem to do is throw about the word 'fallacy' when you're guilty of them yourself ironically.

Yes, it is and no, you don't. If you did, you'd realize that the ToE is not based on "speculation" for starters. That is simply ignorant and given the amount of times you've been corrected on this then ignorance really isn't an excuse.