Search results

In regards to homosexuality, not very much and it's only the modern day equivalent of the legalists of the time that think we should have laws in the present that should make it a capital crime. Prove that people aren't naturally homosexual. There's plenty who'll tell you they are. Did you...

That's what you think should be enacted in the present is it? Prove it isn't or acknowledge the obvious for a change.

He should have absolutely been hauled into the situation as well. Well, whatever He wrote - along with His invitation for anyone without sin to cast the first stone - sure caused this self righteous mob to leave the scene didn't it? Also, even if there had been sufficient witnesses to carry...

You seem to think that there's some sort of 'psychological cause' for homosexuality that can be isolated and cured. That's nonsense. Some people are just naturally homosexual. It's not something that can be 'cured'. Those atrocious 'conversion therapy' centers (thankfully shut down for the most...

i'll concede your first as there's nothing that really establishes her guilt one way or the other, she could have been entirely innocent and set up. The say so of a few witnesses doesn't establish a person's guilt in itself. All of her accusers shuffled off after Jesus invited any who were...

Christianity in the main at least doesn't have much of an issue with it, it's really more the fundamental branches that do. If you think there's some psychological cause that can be isolated and "cured" then then that's pretty out there frankly. Some people are simply homosexual Idolater and...

You should be glad to stand by your convictions no matter who's asking the question. If you can't or won't then it says a lot. Then again, given how you're reduced to feeble name calling and acting like a man child instead of a calm, reasonable adult it's not a surprise. You never have been the...

Well, consider the source Jefferson, by now you really should have considered it multiple times cos how many of those tabloid little headlines with "!!!" at the end have let you down by now in terms of anything coming about or verified? You need to get better sources and you need to drop Q...

You continue to avoid a direct question is all you do. If you believe you're actually "going with God" on the matter then you've had ample opportunity to declare that you think that modern society in the present should have homosexuality and adultery as capital crimes. You don't even have the...

Is that an indirect admission that you believe that we should have laws in the present that would have homosexuals and adulterers put to death? Just a yes or no will suffice. To reduce the case of the woman caught in adultery as simply His 'keeping the law' is as feeble as it ever was. So much...

"The one president who understood truths"? One can only hope Voight was acting but seemingly not. That's what he should stick to.

Where does TGP get any of its "news" from?

They don't see it that way, and who can blame them?

Wow, if you're not a politician then you should consider carving out a career in that very field cos you sure don't like giving direct answers to straight questions, do you? Why is that? Can't speak for yourself? The Bible rarely even alludes to homosexuality and in Jesus' ministry it isn't...

Ah, those nutters who were part of the 'Q' brigade must have got their bonkers info from someone or something else? To be fair. they were the nuttiest of the nutty but when you start off with bonkers to begin with... https://news.yahoo.com/why-qanon-believers-think-jfk-183333654.html

Putin and his twisted regime won't give a flying redacted about the losses of "their" own troops in this risible conflict, they were just canon fodder. Expendable losses. War is hell but all the more so when there was no excuse for waging one in the first place.

What are you, a politician or something? Anyone can parrot the likes of which you're doing and have completely different perspectives on what that is. Do you or do you not advocate the death penalty for practicing homosexuals and adulterers? Yes or no? Gonna warble on some more or just answer...

That wasn't an answer to my question. Why be reticent? Do you or do you not advocate the death penalty for practicing homosexuals and adulterers?

That would have been an astounding counter argument if it held up. It doesn't. I don't remotely consider killing babies to be good and consider consenting sexual relations between adults to be nobody else's business. The only one holding extremist views between us is you dude. Do you or do you...

Rather, you're talking to someone who isn't a religious extremist. What you advocate on here is entirely that, along with others. Supra. You can call me what ya want, go for it and knock yourself out with it. Far right fundamentalism and any sort of religious extremism is a bane on society.