Search results

Well, the good news is that there was nothing remotely credible to suggest that the 2020 election had anything resembling widespread corruption then.

If you "know" it then put your money where your mouth is and provide it then. Show this incontrovertible evidence that proves that there was widespread fraud with no room for doubt on the score. Should be easy enough, right? Otherwise, you haven't got anything and just lap up anything that feeds...

Of course not you strange person. The results bear out that most American people who voted wanted Trump out. Pretty straightforward. You do know how democratic elections work don't you?

Well, he is a manchild after all so if he was so insulted and doesn't come back then let him keep to that monumental success of a platform that is Truth Social!

Well, best to admit that's kinda stupid and not do it anymore then eh?

Fake news like...Fox? Doesn't look like it's just Hannity who was underwhelmed with the whole election fraud nonsense even if he was pedaling garbage on his 'news' slot before his deposition.

Says a man who after being banned, willfully masqueraded on here as a 21 year old female co-ed and denied it until finally the mods had enough. It's not so much that you tried to circumvent your ban but why you chose to come back on here pretending to be the above. What was going on with that...

Um, nah. Most American voters wanted the bronzed buffoon out of office and democracy prevailed. That's the rub. You don't get to cry foul and ride roughshod over all of those who wanted a different result to you and got it. Plenty had to suck it up when Trump won in 2016 without this much cringe...

As is yours with mine, hardly breaking news RD. I'm bemused as to why you bothered engaging at all.

Well, let God judge in His own time then as your views can be dismissed easily enough in the meantime. This was addressed to a guy who has a beef with homosexuals/transgenders and who supports the ex president who advocates their having rights. Not even sure why you waded in on this anyway. Nah.

Wow, for once I kinda agree with you. Plus, methods for bronze age tribes that the Bible describes at the time hardly apply to now when we have much more accurate and reliable methods to determine guilt/innocence. Not infallible certainly and the systems we have still make mistakes even with...

If you were such an 'expert' you wouldn't have come up with such a lame soundbite like this. Patently ridiculous.

How so? You speak as though it's an either/or which is a fallacy in itself. Why can't it be possible to stringently ascertain guilt before executing someone and keep those where there's doubt in custody until their guilt or innocence is established also without risking letting them back into...

I support human rights and far right religious wingnuts and zealots can carry on being puffed up little blowhards as much as they like. That is their prerogative after all and I support contrary views as asinine as they are to be aired. The reality is that their self righteous condemnation of...

Or you in turn. This was fun wasn't it?

About as well thought out as one could expect really.

Of course not, but it's a glaring double standard from wingnuts who declare it to be a hallmark of 'democrats' when they venerate a former president who supported such rights himself.

Nah, I deny it because it's pathetic bunk that was invented by a loon who makes up his own "facts" as he goes along. Here's an actual fact for you: Trump is pro homosexual/transgender rights. Got anything to say about that?

Done that plenty of times thanks.

Eh, don't hold any whacked out conspiracy theory views or akin but thanks anyway!