Search results

Of course it's not false, it's from the very passage of scripture you quoted from. Pfffft, why, cos you say so? Rhubarb and rhubarb (to return the silly nothing soundbites in kind). It's pompous judgment to sit on some self constructed high horse and advocate that others be beholden to your...

Can the attraction be refused as well? Heterosexuals can choose to be in a relationship, get married or stay single and celibate if they want. Homosexuals can do the same.

Well of course they do. Violating another person and thieving are actions so it's entirely a choice when people do so. Any more stupid questions?

I don't bother with Twitter. You're the one making the claim, the onus is on you to defend it. How do you know that no "libs" have been banned?

So...who is "really" a republican? Clarify. If you can that is.

What a cringe fest... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-63837309

Problem is...you're devoid of an actual argument to be reduced to such a silly soundbite. Well, not unless all conservatives are gullible Q & MAGA! wingnuts?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-63837309

Fuentes. What a loon.

They're a grifters dream... Like shooting fish in the proverbial barrel.

Yawn away although it's scripture you're yawning at. Far right fundamentalism is not Christianity. That's not a soundbite, it simply isn't. It's also not an appeal to popularity either, it's simply stating fact. It's not apathy to oppose that which you advocate so that's bemusing. I'm...

Good question. Why on earth would far right wingers be MAGA! nuts if they believe Trump to be as Stripe describes?

How do you know that not a single 'lib' account has been banned? Do you think Musk was right to ban Ye West?

Like who?

Isn't that a form of censorship?

Homosexuals hardly have any say in it. Oh, and there's a difference between prejudice and discrimination also.

Oh, there was plenty relevant to modern day legalists as you should well be aware. Far right fundamentalism is not Christianity. It's a thankfully, tiny sect that albeit vocal is ineffectual and mired in pomp and self righteous judgement. So, your comments about the same applying to me can be...

I would recommend taking your own advice along with recognizing reality. Until you do, you're in no position to criticize anyone else's faculties as much as you like to.

Proud, unloving, unmerciful, unforgiving, boasters, undiscerning etc. Sounds a lot like plenty of the legalist lot from back then and today. Regardless, the fact remains that Christians and homosexuals have the right to air their views in the public domain. To deny that is to deny reality.

Of course it's not false, it's reality. Your particular views about what homosexuals should face and what rights they shouldn't have are entirely irrelevant. You do understand that, right?