Search results

Nearly complete nonsense! The bible talks at length about unintentional breaking of the law (i.e. "sins") but the notion that sacrifices to remove guilt being a man made idea is laughably idiotic! Leviticus 6:1 And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: 2 “If a person sins and commits a trespass...

The whole thread is still here for the whole world to read, Arial! Right back at ya! Hypocrite! This was an INTENTIONAL LIE!!! Right back at ya! Hypocrite! It's all right here for us to read, Arial! I quote YOUR OWN WORDS and then respond directly to them. I am not the only one on TOL...

That's the stupidest accusation that I think anyone has ever leveled at me! If you want to be isolated? Just decide to become an Mid-Acts Dispensational Open Theist. If you slung 10,000 cats in all the Christian book stores that exist in your whole city, you'd never once get within ten miles...

Every post have been in direct response to your own words, Arial. Saying it doesn't make it so. No one is angry other than you. We are simply pointing out errors in the ideas you say you want to discuss. It seems you only want to discuss it with people who agree with it. You're only arguing...

No is preventing her from doing so, least of all me! Why can't you (and she) just let me present my views?

"Helps" not "help". And I never call people names because I disagree with them but because they have demonstrated character traits that are in keeping with the names I choose to call them. People who are stupid, irrational, heretical or whatever SHOULD be embarrassed by their behavior. Such...

If it is your intention not to discuss dispensationalism then why do you keep posting things that are clearly intended to spark debate about exactly that? Let's take what YOU said in YOUR thread point by point... "Revelation has been utterly forgotten..." This is just completely and utterly...

What he's claiming is that Jesus' blood was spilled for all the little small sins that people don't commit intentionally. If you sin on purpose, all that's needed is repentance and you're good! The blood is for all the stuff you can't repent of because you don't do it intentionally. At least...

Tambora knows her argument is rediculous. That's why she's stopped responding and started simply repeating herself over and over again as though we haven't said anything.

No, no, no! Paul's converts were well aware of who Peter, James and John were and they would have understood who their audience was. It would only have been an issue if any of them (or men from them (Gal. 2) came and tried to teach them to follow that other gospel. No, of course, I don't...

By you own admission is it a thread about idealism, which I dispute and for good reasons which I have presented. It has nothing to do with me other than I am participating here on TheologyOnline.com which is a debate forum, not your personal blog site. You can present any idea you want to...

Never suggested otherwise. Sheesh, you people are thin skinned! That isn't true at all! Who told you this?! The rhetorical power of questions is as old as literature! There's even a word for answering a question with a question. It's called "maieutics". It's associated with the Socratic method...

If you CAN'T find it in history? Maybe you could provide a link to your thread.

Who is it here who's being hostile again? Sheesh! I've read Galatians so many times that I have literally lost count - along with the whole rest of the bible, by the way. And it isn't merely that Paul went to the Gentiles, it's that he had to tell the Twelve what gospel he was preaching! He...

@blackSand You are a lunatic. I do not discuss Christian doctrine with non-christian weirdos. It's not like you were responding to anything I said anyway. Just another in a long line of waste of time buffoons. Good bye.

Look, if you don't want to talk about it then don't but something is not irrelevant by virtue of the fact that you declare it to be so. It's not like I ever had any delusions of ever convincing you of anything in the first place. So what? If you were half as intellectually honest as you...

We were told that! The Apostles in Jerusalem had a meeting with Paul, who was instructed to attend BY REVELATION no less (Gal. 2:2), where they heard the gospel that Paul was preaching and then agreed with Paul that they (Peter, James, John, etc) would minister the Gospel of Circumcision to the...

Actually that claim was not made. The claim that was made is that the letters to those churches were to members of the Kingdom (i.e. those who came to Christ during the previous dispensation). Had Jesus wanted to address Paul's converts, He'd have sent the letters through Paul.

Answer the question, Tambora.... Do you believe that there was salvation for gentiles apart from Israel? Was Paul wrong when he told the Ephesians.... Ephesians 2:12 that at that time you were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants of...

Yes