Search results

I guess you could call the Az audit an insurrection, too, since the word is only used to demean conservatives fighting against commies trying to take over the country, and never used against the commies themselves.

Some sickness and death. “A lot” is still in question, due to some sleight of numbers, and relative.

A tip for you. If you want to engage with someone’s post, hit the “post reply” button and make sure it includes the post you’re replying to, or we can’t always tell who you’re talking to. Periods are also helpful.

I was pointing out to @grumix8 that God didn’t need to create to be a father. He would need to create to become a creator, but not necessarily to become the Creator. If there’s only one being, He by default is the Creator, even if He hasn’t yet created anything.

He had a son already in eternity. http://biblehub.com/john/17-5.htm

That’s so racist! And you’re racist for posting about it.

His position is its own challenge.

But the fight’s not over. The democrat on the Maricopa BOS filed suit for a temporary restraining order. Here’s the article https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/breaking-big-az-democrats-file-last-minute-suit-maricopa-county-attempt-stop-senate-audit-2020-election-results/ What’s funny is...

This is what he looked like when he was younger.

If God creates the future based on what we do, then He doesn’t need to know the future ahead of time.

That’s right! You have to be sympathetic to addicts, because it’s a mental health issue. So CBC believes Hunter should be “suicided” in a flurry of sympathy, I guess.

Good! We’re in agreement that you have no idea what scripture really says.

That would certainly be necessary, since you don’t know how you made your points with scripture.

You can also give a link to the thread you want to discuss, like this for this new thread you started: https://theologyonline.com/threads/reply-to-below-thread.55781/post-1793548 I got the link by right clicking on the number 1 at the top right of your opening post. Without some reference to the...

I already did. I said you added to scripture to make your point. You have yet to answer my challenge.

Yes, that was my <sarcastic> point. Now go look in the mirror.

It’s so great how you add to scripture to get it to say what you want.

I wasn’t trying to impress you. Thanks anyway. But you should be careful what you eschew. Philosophy is the love of (leading to the seeking of) wisdom. The scriptures you prefer tell us to love and seek wisdom. You can’t both “prefer” scripture and ignore its mandates. Proverbs 4:5-7 (KJV) 5...

Not sure what you’re asking for. Scripture for a hypothetical?

Your quote actually enforces what I was saying. That God might be able to determine what is truth by willing it to be truth. So moral truth would depend on what He decided to declare moral, making devils saints. Is that a problem for you? It is for me.