Search results

For reference, when Arthur Brain here says "far right," he's using this (wrong) political spectrum: In actuality, the "far right" that he's referring to exists not on the "right," but on the left, as shown by this (correct) political spectrum:

No you don't.

"follow the science" As he constantly touches his mask...

The verse says whoever calls "Shall be saved." It does not say: The calling is evidence of being in a saved state. It does not say: The ones who call on the name of the Lord in a way that pleases God, must already be in a Saved state.

Because you say so? Call, shall be saved. In that order. Or, to put it more bluntly: How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?And how shall they preach unless they...

No, expo, its not, and even if it was common sense (which isn't common anyways), it would still be wrong. The rights of humans are, in no particular order: Life and Liberty; to Worship; to Free Speech; to Purchase and Use Property; to Purchase, Own, and Carry Individual Defensive Weapons...

No, if that were the case, then it would say "Whoever calls IS saved." But it doesn't say "is." It says "shall be."

May want to try this custom search tool: https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=13446e85c74f76be3 https://kgov.com/search

"Whoever calls shall be saved." It's right there in the scriptures. Why do you ignore it?

Groups are made up of individuals. Individuals have rights, not groups. All men have the same rights. Those rights are inviolable. That means that if someone does or wants something that violates the rights of someone else, they are in the wrong, no matter the circumstances. Those who violate...

Too little too late, I fear.

No one said they did such on a whim. And I certainly never implied it. One that should have been over about a year ago. Masks DO NOT work on viruses. That you keep pushing the narrative that they do is what's bunk. Lockdowns do more harm than good in preventing the spread of disease...

If you're going to complain about how we run the site, then maybe it's time for you to take a break. If you're going to posture about how you're thinking about leaving, then I'm going to temp ban you until you figure it out. Come back when your ban is up. Or don't. Up to you.

Don't forget sublimation.

How long have you been waiting to use that one? lol

AKA sucking on the government's teat, rather than simply allowing businesses to operate. Unable to work because of the government, forcing them to take such measures where not needed. Because you say so? Seems like it's harmed businesses more than it's helped. How about they simply return...

Defending using a fallacy won't help you, Chair. Go look up "genetic fallacy." It's a fallacy for a reason.

Such businesses supply (through wages) the means of purchasing food, toiletries, and medicine. Ergo, essential to not only the business owners themselves, but also to the people employed by them. But we know you would rather have everyone sucking on the government's teat than earning an honest...

Define "non-essential." I assert that there is no such thing as a "non-essential" business, because it is essential to the owner of the business.

According to your doctrine: Because their Creator has planned for them to be that way. Because their Creator has planned for them to be that way. Because the saved's Creator has planned for them to be able to see it. Because the unregenerate's Creator has planned for them to be that way.