Search results

Well, it really isn't but let's take it apart for fun anyway. Well, in your case you're not fighting a 'culture war', you're just some pompous guy on the net who spreads misinformation and presents it as 'truth'. When you're found in a falsehood, gaffe or indefensible position (of which...

I didn't write any such thing or anything else to Hutcherson. Not only are you compounding your obvious homosexuality with further prevarication and denial you're reduced to either lies or flat out bonkers and fevered imaginings. Wiz has one account, verified by Sherman. I'm quite happy for...

Nobody's demanding you take anything doofus, there's no need for a lie detector in your case, the evidence ironically is this ongoing joke of a blog. Your obsession with homosexual men is beyond the pale. You also admit to spreading the same tripe on other forums so you spend hours a day...

Stop pomping about and admit your homosexuality man. You're not fooling anyone anymore. Get a grip and come to terms with it, you might find life better for you when you do and have something better than self loathing blogs to occupy your time with. It might even increase your IQ. Just stop...

No surprise you couldn't back up any of your usual or answer anything either. I've one account on here and one alone you paranoid clown. Smoke too much dope or something that you're reduced to thinking everyone's called 'Aaron'? Now, you are so obviously a homosexual man it's just not funny...

Neither, considering I haven't lied about the guy. The question marks over Moore's past were there for all to see along with his highly dubious interview and attempts to downplay the allegations. In his polygraph "evidence" he moans on about how the campaign was adversely affected so why the...

You didn't show any such thing. You don't get to wave things away just because you've convinced yourself doofus. He dropped himself in it and he was hardly being "grilled". Have you even seen the interview? More than enough to raise a fair few eyebrows and question marks, which is what...

Well, let's see. Apart from the allegations themselves there was Moore's interview with Hannity, about as convincing as a party election broadcast - so much so that even Hannity publicly called on Moore to address the allegations. Then there was his reputation at the local mall, Moore's own...

You mean the very same and boringly predictable deflection 'go to's' when you're bereft of an argument on point? The same as you've utilized for the last six plus years? You're being asked specifics in regards to senator Roy Moore and his reticence to take a lie detector test when it might...

I'm neither an atheist or homosexual. I'm only an 'activist' in your deluded little world whereby not agreeing that homosexuals should be persecuted is tantamount to being one. Same ole' with you aCW. Projection at its lowest. Not a jot as to why someone accused of sexual assault would wait so...

http://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/12/28/roy-moore-spokeswoman-polygraph-test.cnn So, even Janet Porter agrees that Moore should have taken such a polygraph test waaay before he did if these allegations were all just made up, so why didn't he? What kind of campaign team did this guy...

Oh, hey, if anyone's found guilty of making up false allegations against Moore, then I fully support them being prosecuted to the full extent of the law. You, on the other hand simply want to dismiss such allegations as non existent despite there being more than a '?' over Moore in regards to...

Well, yes he did, by more than 21,000 votes in the end and his feeble petition on the grounds of 'voter fraud' was summarily thrown out in short order. I know it's a bit of a blow to you as you didn't seem to realize this whereas people who keep up to date with current events already knew but...

You don't keep up to date do you? It's official, your guy lost. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-42506727 Nope, that didn't answer the question. Why didn't Moore get a polygraph test before the night of the election? If he was contesting the results based on voter fraud and not the...

Yeah, his "case" was thrown out in case you're not up to speed and why would he wait until after the election to take a polygraph while arguing that he lost due to voter fraud anyway?

Aw, you're welcome doofus, happy Christmas! :cheers:

You're not gonna top these gems aCW. I'd close your blog now while it's hit its peak! :D

Strap yourselves in oh dedicated hordes of aCW followers, this latest installment is gonna be one helluva ride by the looks of it. One of you may even feel inclined to post in it! :roses:

Eh? Part five's here already???!!!! WEEHEY!! :cloud9: Please say this means it's more of the same recycled, repetitive, pompous, bloated, egotistical windbaggery we all come to expect from such a 'treasured stalwart'? If you don't write 732 'written lisps', allude to other posters being gay...

Fundamentalist nuttiness that would plunge the world into WWIII? Discuss...