Search results

Uh, no thanks... :freak: You are just a crank and then some... :kookoo: (Speaking on behalf of Mr Dante) :Plain:

Eh? You put my own username in your post ya big dope! :doh: You're surely not again implying that posters are sock puppets of each other after Sherman set you straight on the matter how many times now? :freak: Sorry on the latter dude as it seems to be a constant source of irritation to you...

I'm not writing out any loopy scenarios, that's your "job". I've never "indoctrinated" or given any advice on sexual matters to youths, gay or otherwise either.

Oh, I don't expect anything different...

Seriously, that pic and associated again?! :freak:

Related to the thread as to whether children should be executed (they shouldn't) but this is to solely address what kind of personality could even entertain pulling the plug on children and to the point of even stabbing them to death. For the advocates of those in favour of such measures then...

NAMBLA isn't a credited source of information about anything and yet you keep using it. It doesn't reflect homosexuals at all but you'll still keep scouring their site and articles and peddling the same garbage ad nausea. It's just bizarre and boring in equal measure.

Yes, and why on earth would anyone consider NAMBLA as a source of credible evidence for anything anyway?

There's nothing "alleged" about it aCW. Your "Uncle Art/Kit" scenarios would probably have even made Jack Chick cringe. :freak:

Insert "Capital Crime" here. Following an exchange with "Judge Rightly" of which one of the salient parts can be found here: http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?130573-Should-People-Who-Have-Mental-Illness-Retardation-Be-Tried-As-An-Adult&p=5274407&viewfull=1#post5274407 It seems as...

aCW has never been one to vet his sources properly and when he drops the ball (which is a lot of the time) he'll just bury it all under swathes of cut 'n' pastes and blather. It's been his MO for years...

You don't get awards handed out on a whim so you're right and I think you know well enough by now that aCW isn't really interested in anything that gets in the way of his obsessive, pathological agenda that constantly refutes his stereotypes and ill to non thought out MO. He'll be propping up...

You should be used to that by now... ;)

You are aware that nobody takes you seriously right? The only thing you're convincing at is doing a spectacular impression of a gay obsessed, closeted nutcase. :rotfl: Dude, this train wreck hasn't been hard on anybody, except perhaps yourself. It's a running joke.

Oh, well that was convincing and irrefutable. Nothing about him being gay in that either doofus considering it only mentioned women. Really not much rattling about upstairs with you at all is there? Even the rocks have vacated the building...

Was Eva Braun a man? Thank you for providing yet another wingnut post for people to laugh or cringe at... :dizzy:

:dunce: Hitler had homosexuals interned in camps and murdered as you know. Please don't bother with an action replay of your bonkers revisionist bunk. :dizzy:

aCW trips himself up all the time, nothing new.

A question more aimed at those who think a swift and painful execution should happen for plenty but open to others as well. Is it in any way moral to try and convict a person who wasn't/isn't in control of their faculties for crimes? If so, then should children be convicted as adults as well?

And there you have it. If a gay man doesn't engage in anal sex then he's not a "real homosexual". :freak: