Search results

You keep repeating the damnable democrat lie "There was no voter fraud," yet neither you nor anyone else has proven your claim to be true.

Let's calm down and discuss this like civilized Christians instead of wild savage barbarians. Do you believe Fauci channelled US money to the Wuhan lab during the time the Chinese were doing genetic research on dangerous bat viruses there?

Idiots and buffoons think only biased leftists are serious scientists and any researcher or expert who disagrees with leftist narratives is a quack. That is not science talking, that is the bias and possibly the beer talking.

That may seem a rebuke to Dr. Noel's claim, but it is not. How does claiming masks work minimally justify as a rebuke to a video presentation proving masks work minimally?

I get the impression you think Fauci never visited the Wuhan lab, never provided US funding for genetic research there, and had no clue what they were doing there until he read about it in the NY Times.

If a qualified medical doctor should not be believed because he does not parrot questionable leftist assumptions, then who should we believe? Fauci? Al Gore? AOC? Nancy Pelosi?

What we should all learn from this is that increased testing does not mean the danger of infections is increasing. That is why I totally condemn stupid or dishonest democrats for manipulating the evidence in efforts to prolong their unnecessary, oppressive, fascist grip on the country, claiming...

Let me review. Dr. Fauci funded gain-of-function genetic research on bat viruses at the Wuhan lab. That much is a fact. Debunk that fact and we can add further evidence and further discussion.

My first point is that nobody you quoted offered any scientific evidence in an apparent effort to try to effectively persuade their readers that the video prepared by the medical doctor was scientifically unsound.

I have proven it. Did you not read my posts?

I fail to see any evidence from those criticizing the video that they can offer facts and logic to effectively convince anyone that the video is wrong. Criticizing the video is not the same thing as discrediting or debunking the video.

If I gave the impression that dupes who refuse to believe facts and evidence are not convinced their misunderstandings are right and the truth is wrong, then I apologize. I do not believe dupes hooked on error know they are wrong.

So, the alternative witness claims the evidence presented in the Dr.'s mask video is "very questionable." At least the alternative witness did not say the conclusions were "absolutely false and I will show why." The alternative witness claims that particles do go through masks, but that masks...

Peter says Christians have obtained faith through God's righteousness. Peter does not say nobody but Christians can come to Jesus for salvation based upon His righteousness. Christians have received the righteousness by faith. That does not mean they received the gift before they even...

I don't believe you can answer my question, but I will ask again, do you believe God can save anyone He wants to save with or without a sacrifice for their sins?

Other nations are reporting adverse reactions in thousands who have received the vaccine. American health organizations have declared that approximately .003% of those getting the vaccine died from the vaccine. Hundreds of others have also died after getting the vaccine but the results have...

Researchers are still in the very early stages of trying to assess the effectiveness and safety of vaccines. Questioning their effectiveness and safety should be something that everyone does at this early stage. Attributing falling death rates to the vaccine introduced after the death rates...

I admit there was uncalled-for violence from those on the left as well as those on the right. I do not agree with seditious democrat lies claiming Trump caused a near insurrection. If anyone caused a near insurrection it was the crooked democrats who committed massive voter fraud and then...

Sure. You claim that but you do not prove you are right. Carry on.

You take the selective advice of professionals committed to furthering the leftist narratives only? Why reject the science offered by those who contradict the leftist narratives?