Search results

Well, she's facing her own lawsuit isn't she? Some 'kraken'... https://www.salon.com/2021/01/25/sidney-powell-releases-kraken--on-herself-with-new-super-pac-not-far-from-mar-a-lago/

No, there wasn't but I would hardly expect you to think anything other.

All I expect from you is nonsense.

Yup.

Not what I said or promote at all but hey, I was hardly expecting a logical, reasoned response from you anyway.

And now Giuliani is being sued by Dominion for 1.3 billion dollars. Well, that's what you get for making stuff up... https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/giuliani-sued-election-fraud-trump-b1792216.html

Probably because, like me, he's not interested in jumping through your hoops and parameters. See Expos4ever's response on the matter. This is ridiculous.

In black and white world it has to be simple even though in real life it isn't.

See Expos4ever and Eider's responses on the score as they answer you resoundingly.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-former-miss-arizona-tasha-dixon-naked-undressed-backstage-howard-stern-a7357866.html Nothing "creepy" about Trump at all though was there? Oh, well, just stuff like "Access Hollywood" and the like. Still, carry on reading stuff into...

No, in no way whatsoever as should have been blatantly apparent already. Not interested.

Didn't remotely address my post. Kinda figured you wouldn't...

A little girls breast area along with the rest of her are completely non sexual unless there's something wrong with you that you can 'argue' otherwise?

Not to mention the amount of photoshopped bunk as well.

Standard security protocol, for pretty obvious reasons. Nothing to see here unless there's another rock with a conspiracy theory underneath it...

Um, so, bizarre mathematical contortions aside, who is 'Q' exactly and why is Trump now out of office and playing some golf or whatever? You do realize that some who still haven't the good sense to abandon the whole Q quackery are even now claiming that Biden is Q? What's your take on that?

Which one? :rolleyes:

Um, no, just no. You seem to forget Clete, that many of these instigators have been found and prosecuted and they were in no way part of any "leftist" outlet at all but simply far right MAGA cranks. Unless propaganda has been redefined in dictionaries to mean that widespread and verifiable news...

"We're" interested because what happens in the US affects more than just the US, especially when there's someone like the previous occupant in charge and with access to nuclear launch codes et al. Funny how you seem to believe in election fraud and anything else when it suits. Me, I'm a realist...

Except there wasn't, it was just a load of baseless allegations that came to nothing, the last cries of a man who knew he'd lost but didn't have the maturity to acknowledge it. Regardless of what you think of Clinton, at least she had the good grace to concede defeat.