Search results

What exactly would be 'bad enough' to warrant armed violence? Is that the Christian approach to things?

No, your wilful ignorance is just woefully sad.

Shame you can't figure out actual reality instead of swimming in a cesspool of your own confirmation bias.

Sitting on someone's neck for nine minutes? I doubt that's set out in any sort of police training manual. It may be a procedure to initially restrain a suspect but not for anything like that length of time. Probably the only reason he hasn't been charged with first degree murder then.

Nah, that happened with the 'MAGA' crowd and the 'Q' followers. Folk with a bit more than a pebble rattling around upstairs are a bit more savvy.

Sitting on someone's neck for 9 minutes was completely unnecessary. Don't need to be a trained police officer to work that one out or the harm that such could (and did) cause. What requirements weren't met?

Fascinating. Mr Spock would be intrigued by the complete ignorance and general compartmentalization of people into such a paranoid little box no less. "Liberals" no more have "handlers" than "conservatives" have. You're entertaining in a kinda head shaking way if nothing else.

So you admit that Chauvin's actions were out of order? Why aren't you sure?

Has your spell check gone on strike or something? Truth is truth regardless of political persuasion but folk who use the term 'libtard' can hardly be expected to have much if any of that. In context, you don't disappoint on the score.

Well, no, just the police who act as Chauvin did, your paranoia notwithstanding.

Which in no way excuses the officers actions and his rightful conviction.

No, he was convicted because of his actions, all on record. That it doesn't fit your silly little conspiracy narrative is moot.

There's a difference between being open minded and swallowing whacked out conspiracy bunk. Q is ridiculous.

Your time would be better spent trying to decipher a colouring book. The reason why Q is cryptic is because there's nothing of any actual substance to decode but rather a tactic to entice the gullible into thinking they're in on something when they aren't. It's complete and total garbage...

You do realize that several of those who have since been arrested have been identified as Trump supporters, right? Trying to claim that Antifa was behind the events of that day is just flat out bonkers.

If he'd been doing his job he wouldn't have found himself convicted of the charges. The footage of his actions are there for all to see so you can bleat on about him being thrown under a bus as much as you like along with the pathetic little 'libtard' nonsense. Justice was served so suck it up.

What's a gun if not a dangerous weapon?

How edifying.

Not so much...

Not according to court ruling. What you are on about in regards to 'blood lust of the left' is anyone's guess but I don't really expect objectivity and impartiality on threads like these as it is...