Search results

Irrelevant. The ToE has nothing to do with the actual origin of life and you should have known that. It's a basic error that's been addressed multiple times on here. Your latter is patently absurd and shame on you for either being so woefully uninformed on the matter or engaging in wilful...

Thought you might have had something a bit more recent is all. So what if he was wrong? He was a human being, kinda goes with the territory. Sure doesn't deserve all of this 'he's in "hell" garbage' because of it.

Do you see it happening at all?

Well, basic and simple kinda sums your post up really. That isn't an atheist's "starting point". In that essence, someone who doesn't believe in the likelihood of a deity isn't 'rejecting the existence of the creator', they don't believe that it's likely that there's one to reject. I could...

That's over ten years old and even then he isn't trying to 'disprove God'.

No, I'm simply telling you what you should already know. The ToE has nothing to do with the actual origin of life itself, the clues in the word 'evolution'. If you really are familiar you wouldn't have made such a basic mistake.

Okay, up to you. Do you think that there's a chance that Trump could be re-instated in August?

He was a genius and where did he state his intention to disprove God exactly? What a nice guy you are, eh?

Not from what I've seen.

It isn't, for most people anyway. That's why plenty of believers have no issue with it.

No, evolution is a completely separate issue from the origin of life itself.

So, what, you think it's some literal, fiery place then?

Don't go into psychology whatever you do. Your reasoning is as simplistic as it gets.

You do realize that the ToE isn't about the actual origin of life itself, right? It isn't vague in the slightest, not if you're familiar with it and of course there's evidence for it. If there wasn't it wouldn't have become a theory. I thought you said you were familiar as to how theories become...

What point do you think you're making? I asked you if an atheist is solely defined by their lack of belief in a god, not what the term actually means. Your latter was predictably arrogant really.

If you think that the ToE is "vague" then the ignorance is once again, all yours. I'm not on the "side" of anything but there's no fantasy about it.

So, what is it then?

Do you think that all atheists are completely defined by their lack of belief in a god? That's rather ignorant if so. Rejecting fundamentalism is hardly the same thing as rejecting the Bible so that's kinda moot.

Not so much recently you haven't but you have in the past. It's no big deal to me one way or the other. If I agree with someone who's an atheist then eh, so? If someone makes sense and I happen to concur with them then I'll say so, it even happens with conservatives on occasion...

I corrected you where it came to your assumptions that I was an atheist. I've little time for 'organized religion' or fundamentalism. Besides which, it isn't a requirement for Christians to believe in some sort of "hell" as per the sort that certain churches preach.