Search results

Supply the quantifiable evidence and apparent "known facts" then. The floor is yours!

How many guliibles does it take to buy into fraud conspiracy rubbish that has yet to be substantiated with anything remotely credible in support? Oh, the entire MAGA! crowd perhaps.

You've been educated more than enough through the years on here. You're just unwilling to accept that which runs contrary to your set belief. Fair enough. You keep hold of that.

The measurement of the age of the earth/universe isn't solely dependent on radiometric dating you realize? I don't have a 'preferred fantasy' as I don't consider it to be anything like the big deal that you and others who are insistent on a young earth consider it to be. Truth matters for sure...

Well, no, it's not fantasy and I sure don't know everything, never claimed to. It's also pretty funny when people like you call others buffoons but hey, have at it. Again, what does it ultimately matter anyway whether the earth is old or young?

It was over months ago.

No, the evidence is clear and considering that I'm not rooted in a belief system that has a preconceived notion from the outset then I can view it from an objective stance. The constraints of your belief restricts you from even entertaining the possibility that the earth can be a fair bit older...

Well, no. I don't have any preconceived ideas and as I've stated before, if the evidence supported a young earth/universe then I would have no problem with it whatsoever. It doesn't. Simple as. I've no interest in that particular source so you're right there. It's woeful but I read the article...

No, it's based on evidence like anything else that becomes a theory in science. If you can't understand that basic detail then you're in no position to talk about 'facts'.

You don't seem to have any idea of what scientists actually think but just post bizarre and uninformed diatribes regardless.

There was nothing insecure about the last election to start with, as corroborated by those in charge of security that included Republicans. Trump's continual whining and unhinged rants notwithstanding, it's a complete farce.

I've read how radiometric dating works thanks, I've certainly no interest in reading something that Bob Enyart cobbled together. To say that the ToE is based on such is just completely ignorant also.

There was no problem whatsoever with the phraseology and you dropped the ball when you accused me of stating that Dawkins was the only one when he clearly isn't as you now acknowledge. To say it's a 'huge' number of people is just hyperbole. You do understand what hyperbole means, right?

Uh huh. So you accuse me of a diversionary tactic by simply pointing out that you've been linked to an in depth article that debunked your supposedly 'completely detailed' explanation and then link to a Bob Enyart article?! That's hysterical right there. I recommend that you take your own advice.

Uh, I said "only the likes of Dawkins." Do you have a reading comprehension problem? That clearly doesn't state that he is the only one. It obviously implies that there are others of similar ilk so get a grip.

No, you didn't. You parroted on a lot in self congratulatory fashion and dismissed the contrary as you're continually prone to do. You were even linked to an in depth article on the subject and carried on doing the same. You really aren't in any position whatsoever to accuse other people of...

Did I say that he was the only one? Nope. The most vocal probably, but not the only one. And?

Only the likes of Dawkins and he isn't representative of science or evolution in general by any stretch.

You did no such thing and stop projecting.

Then supply some credible evidence to support the allegations then. Otherwise, just accept that Trump lost and get over it.