Search results

The truth is that there's no justification, Biblical or otherwise for executing five year old children, just one of the things (the most vile, certainly) that far right fundamentalism advocates. Sure, such an appalling notion makes me angry as it would anyone who's remotely 'normal'. If it...

I reject far right religious fundamentalism. I reject the notion that it's somehow 'Godly' to execute five year old children as if they're capable of committing a crime let alone one that deserves death. Frankly, RD, you can shove it. You are loveless.

What you propose aka executing people for being homosexual is not love in the slightest. It's far right, religious extremism, just as it is advocating all manner of else, forcing couples into marriage with no possibility of divorce, executing five year old children for somehow committing...

Sure it does. Without love what is anything worth in essence? What you promote is completely devoid of it. As to your latter, the description of love in the Bible is the most eloquent and detailed there is and absolutely contrary to what you advocate. Take your own advice.

Again, there's no express sentiment in regards to homosexuality and if it was of such importance as you seem to note, then there'd be a load more wouldn't there, explicitly stated? There isn't. You're Catholic aren't you? What do you think of the pope's stance on the matter?

Try reading Corinthians where it comes to describing love. There's no insult or false accusation at all. You're a clanging cymbal is all.

Oh, how about a sinner who promotes breath freshening confectionery then?

No need. No mention of homosexuality expressly stated or emphasized. Not interested in kgov.com frankly.

Nobody has ever maintained that it's the emergence of something akin to bubonic plague but it certainly is a virus that has killed hundreds of thousands of people. Even Trump, albeit in what he thought was a private phone call, acknowledged just how serious it was and was going to get while...

Um, nope. That doesn't explicitly state homosexuality at all. It's all moot as it won't be recriminalized for reasons that should be patently obvious. Democratically, it's only far right religionists who even propose it, so how far's that gonna get?

Oh, I can tell far right fundamentalism from sanity any day of the week. The likes of what you propose is just religious extremism and you have no love about you for people at all. Just as well there's no chance of any of it coming about.

Maybe it would just be easier to break this down to basics. There's all manner of things that are advocated that people think are 'Godly' or 'endorsed' by God. From executing homosexuals/adulterers to forcing co-habiting couples into marriage with no possibility of divorce to trying...

There's noting to Biblically support that God would want the types of laws that you and others would have enforced on all of society. Simple as. Rules given to tribes in ancient times scarcely count. Nope. I'm not making any silly claims against Him and you're in no position to say who'll be...

Yes, there is, all too typical of such an extreme belief system. Nope. Taking issue with far right fundamentalists isn't the equivalent of saying that people are right and God is wrong, far from it. Thanks for blowing up another irony meter. Nope, she's a human being and the truth is that...

Rather, you'll go with your own legalism and your post 'exemplifies' all the traits of far right fundamentalism. Full of condemnatory judgement, pomposity, self righteousness, legalese, anything but love, compassion, understanding. The equivalent of the pharisees and the teachers of the law who...

How often did Jesus make mention of homosexuality during His ministry on earth? Thankfully, Western society at least isn't subject to laws based on religious fundamentalism and never will be either.

Not really. If your critical thinking skills operated 'just fine' you wouldn't have associated me with the far left for starters. The only sensible thing you did on that score was run away from it. Hardly 'cute', more of an observation and hardly solely applicable to you in fairness. Um, no...

Pretty simple really. People are free to worship, go to church if they want or not. There's no hardline stance take by the queen, in fact there's not much power the monarchy have in this day and age. Far removed from the times of Henry VIII. There's no way any such law as proposed here would...

Well, rather more than you although it helps not being shackled to a belief system that does away with critical thinking. No, they're just people, your little sensibilities notwithstanding. That's not the truth, it's just you being all pompous and judgemental again and imagining that you're...

Well, an in depth, thought provoking and detailed response that was(n't). Nope, they're simply people like you RD. I'm presuming that you consider anyone who practices sexual relations outside of marriage would fall under your pervert paradigm? Sure, I've read and understood the Bible, that's...