Search results

They're not illegitimate. It's what happens when slanderous and libellous claims are made with no base to them as the aforementioned were culpable of.

Are you on loop or something? (again)

Sure it was, along with Powell and I need to cry into my pillow guy, it's why they're all on the end of billion dollar lawsuits et al.

Nah, I don't have a basement.

Succinctly put although actually, not so much.

"Ballot harvesting like mad"? You sounded pretty sane until that. So, your intelligence is hardly being insulted in relation is it?

Best stay in the basement then.

Au contraire, as long as it's worth reading. What exactly is your supposed point?

My post stands as it is thanks. Any thoughts in your bonce? One's worth bothering with that is...

Which ones?

No, it doesn't doofus and nor does the entirety of evidence but don't worry, nobody's forcing you to get jabbed.

Eh, no argument there. That's why I never get the adulation for the likes of Trump.

Snowflakes... ;)

Then how do you account for the Republican stance on the issue?

Well, maybe if Guiliani hadn't indulged in baseless slander, libel etc he wouldn't be facing punitive measures such as he is. There's a thought eh?

Uh, an election isn't won within the first few hours so don't be dense in turn. Might as well argue that someone in front in a hundred metres final has won before the finishing line beckons. He might have been in front when he stupidly claimed victory but he was far behind when all the results...

Then there shouldn't be any difficulty in citing to a credible source then should there?

Valid election?! For shame! It's blatantly obvious that Trump won by 70 million votes that were somehow morphed into bamboo ballots and overturned by terminator type software etc etc...

Uh, yeah, this entire lnk undermines vaccination... *facepalm*

Credible cites, IOW, ones that aren't far right wingnut ones by all means.