Search results

As before, an article that was pulled by Twitter for dubious source material and upheld by the FEC. News on the matter was readily available for those interested and there was coverage over here on the score. That you think it should have had more and every periodical having it as front page...

Uh, yeh, an ongoing investigation, so nothing established yet. A report that had dubious source material, hence why Twitter pulled it. No media blackout and this is you clutching at the proverbial straw. You claim not to even care about the 2020 election, yet claim that there are many ways...

So, still no tangible evidence to support any sorta widespread fraud garbage or akin then. Ho hum. You have fun though!

Well, he should at least get some more effective spray tan...

Oh, yeah, that was the one component I'd missed from your "contributions". Your apparent "non caring" about the 2020 election results anyway. Well, non care some more. Done and dusted! Biden won!

For a laugh, let's recap on your "contributions" to this thread. You waded in on page 40 something (if you were here before then then eh, who cares?) with some ludicrous nonsense about those who accepted the certified results of the 2020 election being conspiracy theorists. Then some rant about...

The fact is, nothing has been verified so claiming an ongoing investigation is "evidence" is just...silly. It isn't. There was no media blackout as you're aware, fact. That how it was reported doesn't meet your standards is entirely moot. It was readily available. Your contention is speculation...

Your "evidence" relates to an ongoing investigation that hasn't verified anything yet. There was no media blackout on the story and it wasn't suppressed, your "ideals" of how it should have been reported notwithstanding. Your hot air and speculation is not suggestive of anything resembling and...

Nah, you were never gonna have any anyway poor guy. Have fun in your job!

Well, it didn't sway the election but of course you keep telling yourself that. Oh, part of your job is being the arbiter of what gets published is it? Do you work for TGP after all then? It wasn't 'radio silence' at all and who knows what channels you were watching...The NY Post is what I...

It has been on this thread, lamentable in fact. So you don't think it's reported enough or in a manner that you'd find more befitting? So? You're not the arbiter of how articles should be published and the fact remains, there was no media blackout on the matter and it certainly hadn't been...

Oh, I was well aware of this and your poor grasp of a language you supposedly once taught is no excuse for accusing others of being things they aren't. As before, issues regarding Hunter were hardly state secret and there was no media blackout. Your contention is ridiculous. For one thing this...

Had a good idea sure, but as you were being vague I wanted specifics. That a problem for you?

That video's the most interesting contribution you've made to this thread, well done!

It can do but certainly not a given, that would be more akin to you and a lack of evidence.

That was a question for specifics from you. You could have been going on about anything...Also, how does asking a question equate to making a claim of ignorance? Oh, that's right, it doesn't.

No wonder your inferences are all over the place. You sure do have a penchant for attributing things to people they haven't said or come close to implying. Where, exactly, have I 'claimed to be ignorant of news surrounding Hunter Biden? Quote me. The only despondency was among several in the...

Your first would almost be reasonable were you not dumb enough to call evolution a cult. That removes you from rational discourse all in itself. And you failed miserably as not only have I not stated that ideas are science, I've not come close to implying it either. Your faulty inferences are...

Go cry into your thread about it.

Awwwww, shame innit?