Search results

Of course it doesn't happen, hence that word - hyperbole. I know the game inside out thanks having being forced to watch it and being bored over and over by it as a kid. Thankfully, it's a lot less drab nowadays.

Hence the hyperbole Stripe. Obviously a bowler is not going to bowl 25 no balls in a row... Oh, and people do get sacked in sport, get a grip.

About as much as he's paying me to slag him off along with his odious regime - nowt. Noted on Ukraine.

The Ukraine denuclearized years back and posed no threat to Russia whatsoever. Putin is an unhinged terrorist aggressor and you make excuses for the despot's mass murdering actions and all associated. Absolutely pathetic. Carry on being an apologist for the tyrant.

Maybe you should just have concentrated on the primary gist - you being sacked.

There was nothing "morally justified" about the Iraq war. Up to you if you want to educate yourself on the matter.

Our positions have been unequivocally clear from the outset with no deflection or prevarication. Absolutely no tolerance for the despot in the Kremlin along with no excuses or apologies for his and his regime's murderous, terrorist actions. Did it need to be spelled out in larger font for you...

Learn to recognize hyperbole one of these days...I'm well aware of the rules of cricket in play and the analogy should have been obvious even to you. Heck, I was brought up and bored to death on the sport as a kid.

Then educate yourself further and find out why there was no justification on that score without WMD then. Or not.

So, you started talking to him about it yet or are you still not up to speed?

In cricketing terms it's a double run out...

Crazy seems about right...

Funny how some folk like to throw such deflective irrelevance around when faced with a simple, direct question isn't it? How hard can it possibly be to condemn Putin, his regime, his invasion and atrocities? Shouldn't be hard at all and yet still...

Shows how much you know about the subject then if you consider such to be a 'non story'. No, America was not 'justified' in invading Iraq and neither was Britain and it had squat to do with WMD either if you cared to educate yourself on the matter.

Heck, the media is still patiently waiting for Sydney Powell's kraken to make an appearance... Well, okay, no they're not.

There was plenty of intelligence that showed no such thing and there was steadfast opposition to the war from many sides. There was some more than shady stuff going on with this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katharine_Gun On 13 November 2003, Gun was charged with an offence under section 1...

That wasn't an answer to my question but more deflection. Do you condemn the actions of the mass murdering despot Putin without excuse or not? Yes or no?

I condemn any sort of apologies or excuses for the despot that obviously includes some of the propaganda that's been aired on this thread by certain people. Any more dopey soundbites?

To give the full article from Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proud_Boys Nothing to be proud of with any of that and hardly surprising that some of its wingnut offenders wanted to cooperate considering.

Have you even read through any of this thread, even the last ten or so pages? UN is doing nothing of the sort and if you're not up to speed then scroll back and start getting there...