Search results

Might be abetter idea, and would help with trangulation.

Here's what I'm seeing now:

This is what I'm seeing:

Says it's broken on mobile.

Here it is for Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.happymagenta.spyglass

You can use Tapatalk to upload the photos from your phone to TOL

I pick up from that plant on an almost daily basis. In fact, I'll be picking up from there tomorrow morning.

Musterion is anything but a shill, and "disinformation agent"? Maybe you should look in the mirror more often.

“But if a man finds a betrothed young woman in the countryside, and the man forces her and lies with her, then only the man who lay with her shall die.But you shall do nothing to the young woman; there is in the young woman no sin deserving of death, for just as when a man rises against his...

So, basically, your argument boils down to "it's can't be a figure of speech because it can't be a figure of speech"? That's what I'm getting from the above. Why can't "mouths" (https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?t=kjv&strongs=h6310) be used figuratively? (which word, by...

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH! That was hilarious!

?

By the way.... https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05055-7

History as a witness: And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and books were opened. And another book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by the things which were written in the books.The sea gave up the dead who were in...

Nope. I'm saying that math proves the earth is an oblate spheroid. So again, you're faced with the problem of murderers getting away with murder because no eyewitnesses are available. So are you not able to apply that reasoning to passages that say "by the mouth of two or three witnesses"...

To someone who isn't paying attention to what they're reading, of course it says "eyewitnesses." Funny how you think I'm quoting 2 Corinthians 13:1. Not that it matters, but I'm quoting what that verse is quoting. Actually, it does matter, because context is important. “One witness shall not...

I didn't say "eyewitnesses." I said witness(es). If you need two or three eyewitnesses (according to you) to establish that this suspect murdered that woman in the middle of nowhere with no one around, then you may as well let the suspect go, because he made sure no one was around to witness...

And what about using math to predict outcomes? I know that without math, my car's engine wouldn't function at all, my garage door wouldn't open, or would open too fast and damage my house, my TV wouldn't function properly, etc... Bridges wouldn't be able to stand under their own weight...

Tell me, PJ, how many times were people in the Old Testament referred to or referenced in the new? What about events and places? Were they used by the person in the NT to make his point?

So using historical evidence is out of the question when trying to determine something that happened in the past... Gotcha... Thanks to you, we can now no longer solve cold-case files.