Search results

1) Is something (like humility) good because God recognizes it as good? Or, 2) Is something good because God commands that it is good (as Socrates put it, because God loves it)?

What I said is COMPLETELY related! You: "What God gives its received because God gives it." Scripture: Jesus is the Light, who was given by the Father to the World, and the world rejected Him who the Father gave!: Exactly the OPPOSITE of what you say!

Still waiting for you to answer my question, B57.

No. It's not.

The bit I just quoted is FROM the second article.

It's not mandatory to get vaccinated.... Unless you want to not be suspended from work without pay and even fined... In other words: if a person wants to continue living like a normal human being, it is mandatory for them to get vaccinated.

Keep reading: Any worker who fails to present a valid COVID-19 health certificate will be suspended without pay after five days, but cannot be sacked. Those non-vaccinated could also be fined up to €1,500.

Not the USA, but UK... https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/uk-has-ten-days-save-christmas-retail-sector-Warns

I just quoted scripture that says that the world rejected what God gave to them, you numbskull! JUST READ THE TEXT!

Don't overstate your position. Natural selection DOES occur. What DOES NOT occur, however, is the gain of function through natural selection, as natural selection" can only REMOVE the unfit, not make a species more fit.

There is no scripture that says that whatever God gives causes the person He is giving it to to receive it. In EVERY. SINGLE. VERSE you just posted, the person who received it, did so willingly, and there was not a single passage you quoted that was not speaking of those who had already...

Again, "the tops of mountains." The only time in recorded history when that occurred is during the Flood of Noah. The amount of energy involved DID affect the rotational speed of it, from 360 days per year, to 365.24 days. But enough to "knock the earth out of its orbit"? Please. At best...

Gender is male and female. It's an expression of a biological fact, either XX or Xy. The exception being hermaphroditism, which is a mutation, and not normal. In other words, the exception proves the rule. Incorrect. There is just a very wide variety of ways for perverts to rebel against God...

One more reason to get or keep your kids out of the Godless government schools.

This is future knowledge. And this is present knowledge. And thus your argument is a bait and switch, perhaps unwittingly. No open theist denies that God can know what is (present knowledge) in our minds. The argument is against God knowing what will be in a person's mind BEFORE they think...

Don't play dumb, Robert. It doesn't suit you.

Again: Attack the beliefs, not the person. Ad hominem is a fallacy for a reason.

I'd have to say that the reason I use "soul" to describe what both humans and most animals have, despite that the two could be seen as interchangeable, is that God is Spirit, and we are made in His likeness. It is our spirit that allows us to relate to God, who is spirit. Hebrews 4:12 tells us...

Using fallacious arguments to assert your position. Begging the question is a logical fallacy. You're using question begging statements in your posts. I'm telling you to stop it, because it's illogical and irrational to use such arguments. Continuing to do so only degrades your reasoning...

You realize Calvin lived from 1509-1564, right? He's been dead for nearly half a milennia... Whether he believed in God or not, he has already been shown the error of his ways, and already been held to account. There's no reason to attack Calvin. Attack his system, not the man himself...