Search results

Cite for 'tampering with evidence'? There weren't 'multiple problems' either. Trump just lost.

Because you say so?

Again, plenty of sane Americans including Republicans have accepted the results of the 2020 election.

JR, Enyart's chart is simply one of highly subjective and biased opinion, that's all. It isn't factual or true. That you may happen to agree with it doesn't validate it whatsoever. If you cared about accuracy you'd question it, not venerate it. People simply can't be compartmentalized into such...

I made no such claim. There are plenty of sane Americans who aren't democrats who have accepted the results of the 2020 election.

Again, of course it isn't and if this is all you've got as 'counter' then it isn't up to much. That chart is just one man's subjective opinion and doesn't reflect actual fact at all. If you want to buy into it then hey, you do so. It's not truth by any stretch.

Of course it isn't. If you think people can be so neatly compartmentalized into some little box then up to you but it's entirely subjective and has no foundation to it. Simple as that. Anyone can come up with something akin and it would just be the same.

Yeah...fantastic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breitbart_News

You're a crazed conspiracy theorist because of the amount of spaced out bunk you post and expect others to take at face value. Not gonna happen. Nobody but nobody here has ever claimed that any given government is 'pure as driven snow' for starters.

The sane ones recognized the results of the 2020 election.

Did you read the article?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/may/06/arizona-republicans-bamboo-ballots-audit-2020

The Arizona audit was hardly handled by partisan democrats, it was 'run' by cyber ninjas.

That isn't a "true political spectrum" by any stretch. It's just Bob Enyart's highly subjective and inaccurate take on it.

Well, to be fair, you'd have to make such evidence up because none of the tangible sort exists... Trump knew fine well that he'd lost or was likely to lose before he made that bonkers victory speech only a few hours after the initial results were coming in.

https://www.christianpost.com/news/popular-internet-pastor-greg-locke-marries-church-assistant-after-divorce.html

Doubtful that he'll admit it but then, some folk still think Trump will be reinaugurated some time in August somehow so hey... (They're not exactly playing with a full deck)

Not at all. Let them use whatever they wish. A microscope isn't going to magically uncover evidence that isn't there no matter what its setting.

Um, no. I have a great deal of confidence that there was no such fraud to start with and considering the complete lack of credible evidence to support said outlandish claims then it would have been a safe bet to place a wager on even if the odds wouldn't have been all that great. You, on the...

Oh, so one rule for 'democrats' and another for everyone else? Wow, so Republicans found no evidence? Big surprise there then... https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/548794-there-was-trump-russia-collusion-and-trump-pardoned-the-colluder