Search results

No, because it was absolutely degrading and pathetic to boot. How is it 'sage advice' to encourage young men to get girls as young as 15 because if they wait until they're 19 or so they're suddenly going to *morph* into rabid and selfish feminists and the like? What kind of 'sage advice' is that?

Okay, you'll have to go into some more detail in regards to the former and in specific detail really. As regards Robertson, he was talking to a crowd, it's not difficult to find and so what if it was directed at 'younger men'? That make it all okay? Get over yourself with your' feminist'...

Robertson's statement is a problem because it's asinine and pathetic. Do you agree with him that men should get girls as young as 15 so as they do their bidding rather than 20 when they're not so easily manipulated or pliable as is his obvious implication and liable to pick their wallets? There...

Kinda just time for Trump to disappear from anything newsworthy and let his dingbat sycophants form their own ridiculous party...

If there was no refuting it then it would have been brought to the table in court by Trump's lawyers. Why didn't they?

Ah, 'The Fast Show', cool!

Oh good grief, yet more paranoid and bizarre rubbish. Let me guess, the "illuminati" are going to take over?

Um, yeah...but rather, nope.

Not exactly an accomplishment as such, rather a side effect but yeah. I recognize that politics is regarded somewhat differently in America than it is in the UK, at least to some extent. Over here, the prevailing attitude is one of cynicism and to be honest, apathy. People in the main don't...

Where exactly, at least in the western hemisphere? Child protection laws have stringently tightened with a zero tolerance towards molestation in the UK as with rape or any sexual assault so if there's anywhere in the US where it's tolerated then that's abominable. Then again, I recall the dulcet...

Well, that's up to you then really although at least you're not so daft as to equate such with society accepting rape and paedophilia because it blatantly wouldn't.

Oh, "theepochtimes" again as a source of "news", there's a shock. Nope. It's all done and dusted just like Sidney Powell's still slumbering kraken.

Anyone who thinks such is a complete nut. Next?

A few years ago this sort of bonkers would at least raise one of my eyebrows. Nowadays, it's almost become blasé.

A well respected man and deservedly so: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hill-Norton As much as I don't tend to get involved in 'UFO' threads so much, I'm not so arrogant as to exclude the possibility of there being life elsewhere in this vast cosmos of ours even if I'm sceptical of a lot...

The guy buys into all sorts of conspiracy and outlandish bunk so I suspect he's actually, and sadly enough, sincere, as misguided as that sincerity may be.

The same as we do with any accusation a man makes, at least for the sane among us. If an accusation has sufficient evidence to corroborate it and it holds up to scrutiny then fine and if it doesn't then do the math. Heck, hardly a gender issue.

Answered a number of times already. I'm not averse to voting processes coming under scrutiny or being investigated. There's a flip side to that of course. Baseless allegations of fraud and the ridiculous sort of conspiracy garbage all too evident on here deserve to be ridiculed, mocked and...

A shame they don't come with any more pay really...else, meh.

Yeah, erm, credible evidence yes? Not "theepochtimes" or some other wingnut site. Else corroborate it.