Search results

Well, not a "Darwinist" but hey, gotta keep that pompous little trope going anyway eh? Anything of substance to support your little notion or is it just your little notion?

Um, in case you weren't somehow not already aware, your assertions are worth any number multiplied by 0. So, provide something (sensible) to back them up or get used to being dismissed. Pretty straightforward.

No, he's not and Clete is someone who I disagree with all ends up in the main and it's kinda hysterical to see this in some senses. He may be far right but he's not thick.

What an ignoramus.

Typical Stripe: Dumb Darwinist tropes that are completely irrelevant. Still no cite, just Stripe asserting something in want of support. Yawn and yawn again.

Well, at the risk of sounding like a 'professional disinformation agent' I'd suggest it's because a long term far right winger on here is exasperated by the sheer lunacy that now abounds on here and is even encouraged. It wouldn't have been years ago. This place always wore conservative bias on...

Brought to you from amateurwingnut.somethingorother

Vax not mandatory and protocols in place. Heck, you'd think there'd been a pandemic or something going on .

It is if it proposes one thing and then undoes it with another as highlighted. People working in the care sector in the UK have to show they're uninfected on a regular basis as per common sense and sure, vaccinations, also per common sense are recommended in order to stem the virus. Well, unless...

Then it's self contradictory.

Again, the article that way2go provided, the second one at least shows otherwise as I quoted.

You didn't address the salient part I quoted from your latter cite. Is this from your 'zerosense' one? Otherwise, it isn't mandatory for anyone in work to get vaccinated but it is mandatory to show that they aren't infected in essence.

Well, that's not saying that everyone has to be vaccinated in order to work: "All employees will be required to prove that they have been vaccinated against COVID-19, are recovering from the infection, or have recently tested negative for the virus."

Are you saying that you think that you are a far right fundamentalist or was the "not" inadvertent? I don't consider you to be so although I am wondering what the point of this thread is?

Well, if I'm against the DP with the exception for horrific crimes and even then only if such has been established with absolutely no room for even a shadow of doubt, then your scenario isn't applicable. To me, anyway.

Noooooo! I told you that in confidence!!

If it's legit (which zerohedge sure isn't) then absolutely. Any sane source to back this up?

Well, best add it to the shopping list then.

So, still no cite then? Just the usual, lame 'Darwinist' tropes? A reasonable conclusion is that you haven't got anything to back up your supposition or you'd have provided it by now.

Haven't had the thing. Your point?