Search results

Um, yeah, you're still gonna need to do something with this in order for it to make sense...

C'mon man. Typos and grammar mistakes are excusable in longer posts but your 'contribution' was barely a sentence. In fact, even with a bit of editing it would still need some help in order to make any sorta sense.

That phone call was incriminating enough...

Who are you on about? Crenshaw? Otherwise, the only shmucks are those still peddling widespread fraud nonsense.

Well, thanks for the thoughtful response firstly. Secondly, I used to be in a 'charismatic' church many moons ago and people just within that couldn't agree on the topic at hand. As it happened I became disillusioned with it and left although my interest didn't wane.

Some of them still have some sense then.

And how would that be determined exactly? There's plenty of opposing voices in Christianity that all claim to have it so which one's right?

Of course it doesn't determine truth but your background determines a lot in life and if you were brought up in a country where Islam is the prevailing religion then it's a fair bet that your belief system would be entirely different to what it is now. Where it comes to "truth" then which one...

Do you need other people to suffer as part of your belief? Is there something that won't satisfy if other people don't wind up in some sort of "hell" for you? I'm surmising that you won't take any sort of credit for avoiding such a fate as well? That it's all the divine work of God? That all you...

I don't dude. I'm not the one reduced to kindergarten insults in lieu of proper debate. Ho hum...

I've no problem with God having all of the bases covered. I'm more bemused by those who think He hasn't...

It's true enough really though isn't it? As soon as a life enters the world it's only got one guaranteed destination in one sense - death, no matter what. Depending on how long that life lasts then we have threads like this one that pontificate on what may be the ultimate 'fate' of said...

Oh, sorry dude. Brit, sure, "homo", nah. You're certainly not a skeptic or any other "ic" but rather just a bit of a daft little kid going by your 'contributions' with me. Anything of actual substance sans the puerile to offer?

This from someone who buys into election fraud bunk and laps up anything no matter how bonkers that "supports" it, while still sniveling about the results a year a later. You're almost a parody of yourself as are many others on the far right fringes.

Go look in a mirror. Your vapid "leftist" stuff was old from the get go.

Wow, just imagine the sort of morons, misogynists and general nut jobs who'd follow that rubbish...

The "duh" is all yours. Do you even know anything about 'Qanon'?

Good thing nobody said it did then isn't it? The far right don't have a monopoly on stupidity and gullibility either although the likes of Q and crazy associated could only stem from that side of the fringe...

It's 'rubbish' alright, bat crazy in fact but it's not of UN's doing. This is the sort of space cadet nonsense that 'Q' has been shoveling from the get go and unfortunately many gullible far right wingers bought into it. Didn't you realize that 'Q's manifesto revolved around the notion that...

A sad indictment on the state of the republican party if that's the case...