Search results

Says the guy who posits that the US wants nuclear war with Russia. Why did NATO refuse to enact a no fly zone over the Ukraine?

Whoopsie!

Did I? Well go figure...bring it on!

Bring it on!

You need to learn how to do proper research altogether instead of lapping up whatever "news" any given bonkers conspiracy site feeds you. NATO is more than the US, fact. The US is not angling for nuclear war with Russia, also fact. Get a flaming grip.

Gotta laugh... :ROFLMAO:

NATO is not the US alone and you are off the planet. If the US wanted nuclear war with Russia it hardly needed the invasion of the Ukraine did it? Have you ever considered that maybe, just maybe you promote bat crazy conspiracy rubbish? Why do you suppose that NATO shied away from enacting a no...

Was that the one where some game show host gives a contestant a choice of three rooms with a star prize behind one of them and then reveals that one of them doesn't have the prize within and then gives the contestant the chance to change his original choice to the two remaining rooms? Oh, wow...

Eh? Of course it wasn't, it was ham fisted turnip donkey as per usual. I know my limits...sorta...

Okay, firstly I retract the 'word salad' bit, that was uncalled for on my part. I don't consider myself any more eloquent then you either, I reckon there's a bunch of us who have a good grasp of vocabulary and can express ourselves well. Frankly, if there was a competition on the eloquence score...

Do you have the right to walk out of your house and go about your business without the likely fear of being hit in the head with a baseball bat? If you are and you survive the assault then are you within your rights to file charges for said assault? You've got even more word salad going on than...

What "silliness"? I'm not being silly, I'm asking you pertinent questions unless you absolutely decree that they're silly but surely that should be open to question unless your opinion is absolute? See now how your own position goes against you?

How can you agree with such people if they declare such to be wrong and in absolutist terms? Do you even understand your own thread? Nice word salad though...

The past isn't the present. We're not living thousands of years ago where primitive tribes lived in primitive times. We're in the modern age so I'll ask you in regards to the present. Is there any valid reason for the rape, torture and killing of a child? Straight answer please.

And? There's been all manner of barbarity and suffering inflicted in this world through the ages but that's no reason to excuse such in the present where we have societies that value civil liberties and to be free from the likes of rape etc that the law rightfully decrees a crime. You're one to...

Never claimed to be or anything akin and you yourself don't know what the future will hold and so what? I don't need to know to be able to categorically state that there's no justification for rape. I don't shy away from absolutes and as much as you may think you're not doing so you are with...

How are you not declaring absolutes yourself here?

Who routinely deems it necessary to kill millions of fellow human beings for the future of humanity exactly? Funny how you accuse others of having strange priorities when you like to distance yourself from absolutes.

Pfft, I don't want to own a gun or have anything like the gun culture that's prevalent in America. Most all countries don't and don't want it either. Hopefully there'll be more sensible laws enacted that deny teenagers access to weapons of such destruction as evidenced in the latest massacre...