Search results

Aha! I think you're onto something there. Now why didn't I think of that?

By "preventing a pregnancy," what do you mean if not preventing impregnation/preventing becoming impregnated?

No, idiot. I did not say anything about trying. One has to be engaged in impregnating someone (or being impregnated by someone) in order to not be preventing a pregnancy. How did you end up being so dreadfully stupid as you demonstrate youself to be?

LOL

So, you're engaged in impregnating right now? Sorry, stupid, but you can't have it both ways. Either you are impregnating right now, or you are not.

What do you mean by "to prevent pregnancy"? Are you engaged in "preventing pregnancy" right now? Your phrase, "the right to essentials," is actually not even the name of any right. Many a phrase of the form, "the right to ________," is not the name of any right. For example, "the right to...

Sounds like you're still throwing your tantrum over it. Whether or not you like it, the fact is that YOUR use of the word, "politician," is YOUR use of the word, "politician." And that's what I asked you about: YOUR use of the word, "politician." So, according to you, President I'm...

Agreed. What, according to your use of the word, "politician," would make someone a "politician"?

IOW, you're still refusing to answer the question I asked you, preferring instead to just keep cranking out whatever sorry excuses for "humor" your sorry "wit" can think up. Whatever you may have had for a brain seems to have dried up...

IOW, you once again refuse to answer the question I asked you. To where "on the politcal spectrum" are you referring by your phrase, "in a swamp of his own making"?

So, where is Trump "on the political spectrum"?

Do you mean to tell us that he did not know better than to lie to congress? Of course he knew better than to lie to congress. Duh. His TDS motivated him to flout what he knew was the right thing to do, so that, instead of choosing to not lie to congress, he chose to lie to congress. Why are you...

So the booboisie actually prefer to be called "teats," eh? Go figure.

I do not know what you are talking about, hence the question I asked you, idiot:

He should have known better than what? Why do you refuse to condemn his shameless act of lying to congress that is on display in the video? Saying "he should have known better" is you trying to excuse him of his perfidy. He should not have lied to congress. You obviously do, indeed, play...

Sorry, Arthur Brain, but antics like that are never going to whitewash your glaring self-contradiction. Out of the one side of your mouth, you said no woman has a right to murder, whereas, out of the other side of your mouth, you said that women have the right to murder. Who are you accusing...

Here, you've just contradicted yourself. On the one hand, you have said, "Nobody has a right to murder," whereas, here, you are telling us that a woman has a right to murder.

You don't what? You don't say women should be allowed to take the "morning after" pill? Should women be allowed to take the "morning after" pill? Yes or No?

Um, as anyone who had read the OP could tell from merely reading the OP, we already knew that fact. That is not what this thread is about. This thread is about a shameless Democrat congressman who brazenly lied to congress about that fact, and was caught in and called out for his lie, and...

Oh, man....I know his sorry track record. It's pathetic. Yet, I do take his response, "Nobody has a right to murder," as an answer in the negative to the question, "Does the woman have the absolute right to murder her child or not?" Whether he is sincere in it, I do not know. And, for aught...