Search results

How could he take credit for your manifestly severe character defects? Oops....sorry....I meant to say "mxnifestly". :oops: Having actually considered your ravings in this thread, it's perfectly clear you've made no case. All you've done is make claims you've not supported with any facts...

God says to the Israelites: annabenedetti takes to lecturing God: Clearly it's not circular reasoning, and clearly you do not know what circular reasoning is. But if you wish to contest the fact that you do not know what circular reasoning is, feel free to lay out a syllogism for us that you...

week: "a period of seven days" (OED)

Enjoy your chagrin.😉 He just wants to be right, as do I. Because to be right is to believe the Bible Truth. And we are right since we believe the Bible Truth, whereas you're wrong because you refuse to believe the Bible Truth. Now, you ought to want to be right, also, but clearly you don't...

Your temper tantrum is not going to whitewash your self-contradiction.

What's "100% spot on"? That he's not fake, and thus really pro-abortion? That he's fake, and thus not really pro-abortion? Which is it?

Was that intended to be meaningful? If so, could you please describe an example of whatever the heck you imagine you meant by it?

You don't seem to understand that whenever someone is banned from a platform, he/she is banned from it because someone with the power to ban them bans them. Guidelines don't ban people; people ban people.

I'm probably quite a lot less miffed about that than she is miffed about the fact that she had already shot herself in the foot, boldly advertising her anti-intellectualism by having literally admitted to me, in a debate forum of all places (and as though it were something for her to be proud...

So then he's not fake? You said he's fake, but now you're telling me he really is pro-abortion. Which is it? If you don't mind, don't just say that. Instead, please try to clarify what (if anything) you mean by it.

Fake? So he's not really pro-abortion?

Fake? So those whom you call "right-wingers" are not really what you call them?

On the contrary, yes you did. You assigned to it a time span ≠ six 24-hour days. And you know what they say about assigning.

It appears she topoled her own "argument": ...but on the other hand... :unsure: 👼@annabenedetti :devilish: 🤔

Well yeah, the text would be less efficient for them because, in order to be enabled to benefit from it, they'd have to first drop what they are doing and go learn how to read.

Seeing his most recent reply post to me, it seems @User Name apparently got tired of always having no point, and from his new avatar self-portrait it appears your advice to @annabenedetti, here, gave him an idea on how to have one:

Since noise words like "racism," "sexism," and "transphobia" are merely used mindlessly and emotively by leftards, interchangeably, to signify anything and everything leftards hate to hear said, what you're saying is:

#AccountabilityNotAmnesty