Search results

It was a yes or no question, Robert. I see neither a yes nor a no in your entire post. So again, yes or no: Can God work with individuals?

If it's what God intended for women, then why not? They would be much better off, and especially their children, too. This is an appeal to novelty, a fallacy. The taxation rate is extremely high because of socialist programs like government run education systems and welfare. No one...

Would you agree or disagree that the solution I proposed, dividing the workload of having a job and raising kids between two people, rather than one who leaves his or her kids in the hands of strangers, solves the problem, regardless of how insensitive or unrealistic it is? If not, why not...

I see you didn't answer my question. Would you please answer the question I asked? Here it is again: Can God work with individuals?

You have yet to establish it as fact. Don't get ahead of yourself, B57. Says the one using logical fallacies to defend his position. Hypocrite.

@annabenedetti @Rusha To nip this in the bud: I checked. Completely new user.

It's akin to rearranging the deck chairs on the sinking Titanic. Get your kids out of the Godless government schools. Don't threaten them that you won't return if they don't comply, just don't return, period. Yes, teaching one's children oneself requires making sacrifices. So which do you...

Agreed. I doubt it.

Question: Can God work with individuals?

This is an argument from silence. You are the one making the claim that God gave Lazarus life, therefore YOU are the one that has to establish that claim. I claim that God gave Lazarus a command to "Come forth." I do not go beyond that, because scripture does not go beyond that. Also: If...

There's a difference between a dictator and a king. Please do not conflate the two. If you're going to make the argument that God opposes monarchies, then you also make the argument that God opposes representative forms of governments even more so, as He KILLED the people who such a...

I think to say A) that God wants other nations ruled by an earthly king, and B) that there is clear instruction for it, would be overstating our position, if not simply false (in the case of B). That being said, it would not be wrong to say that the idea that any nation, let alone America...

You have yet to show that Jesus gave Lazarus anything other than a command to come forth. Stop begging the question. Also: If you're going to continue to use Lazarus as your defence for calvinism, I'm going to point out that if you're right, then Jesus saying what He said in John 11:14-15...

The counterargument is that God put the laws concerning the actions of earthly kings ruling over the nation of Israel into the Mosaic law LONG before the Israelites' desire to have an earthly king, rather than God reigning over them directly. Which raises the question, why put those laws there...

You should consider the possibility that it's not a stupid question, but rather that there's a point to it that you seem to be completely missing...

I don't care about your opinion unless you can back it up with facts and strong reasoning, and most importantly, with Scripture! What I care about are the facts, namely, the fact that you have yet to make a compelling argument FOR your opinions, especially one that hasn't already been addressed.

No one has argued otherwise. Again:

https://kgov.com/bel/20050601

thatsthejoke.jpg

Objectively, it's quite clear who's unwilling to be convinced. I'm not the one using phrases like "I still believe..." after being rebutted, however soundly, in the previous post They were rejecting God's timing for a king. Such is, inherently, a rejection of God as their King. Pay attention...