Search results

Also: It's "Sars-CoV-2".

Because we should totally believe everything China says...

No, it's not. And your "explanations" contradict plain scripture, which NEVER puts belief after salvation.

Actually, there is. Deadly negligence is a crime. “When you build a new house, then you shall make a parapet for your roof, that you may not bring guilt of bloodshed on your household if anyone falls from it. - Deuteronomy 22:8...

Yes, people like you. ... mock people like you. Why do you assume that Satan was flung to earth? Sounds like a serious case of begging the question to me. Which supports MY view. Not yours. Sounds like Genesis 3:19... Yeah, you're truly hilarious. So is what you believe. I think...

This is putting the cart before the horse. Scripture says the reverse of what you say.

You're the one asserting that "God just didn't choose them." so who else should be blamed according to your position? What better excuse does the unbeliever have than "God didn't love me enough to choose me" according to your position? By saying that, you call Paul's words into question, or...

Hypocrite.

Which doesn't inherently make us ultra-dispensationalists. Or can't you take us at our word when we say "We're not ultra-dispensationalists"? As mentioned before: The ENTIRE BIBLE is FOR everyone, regardless of Jew or Gentile. However, some parts of the Bible are written TO specific groups...

People like you say the darndest things... :LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL:

Me thinks you aren't contributing anything to the thread with this kind of post.

Saying it doesn't make it so. I quoted scripture. You have mere assertion. Wrong. His rising from the dead shows His power. His willingness to die on the cross shows us His love. His death reconciled the entire world to Himself, and His life saves those who call upon Him. That's what...

False. "We shall be saved by His LIFE" Romans 5:10 Scripture cannot be more clear. Wrong. For “whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.” - Romans 10:13 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans10:13&version=NKJV Scripture cannot be more clear. In mercy and truth...

That's not how "discussion" works. As Clete mentioned earlier, taking the discussion in a direction that the OP of the thread wasn't expecting is not against the rules. In fact, it can be far more fruitful (not to mention fun) than expecting everyone to just simply go along with the flow of...

Do you have a mouse in your pocket or something? Debatable. No, it wasn't. Not sufficiently. And certainly not by "historical fact." See Clete's post.

"could exist" or "could not exist"?

In other words, I agree, but that does not inherently preclude me or anyone else from coming into your thread and pointing out perceived errors in those views, which is entirely the point Arial doesn't seem to understand, and the point we've been trying to make.

In what way is me, or anyone for that matter, presenting their views in another person's thread preventing that person from presenting their own views? Chrys, it's a forum. Barring breaking the rules, you can post just about whatever you want (within reason) and literally no other member can...

How about on the forum in general?

False. My beliefs have no bearing on what is true. I simply believe what it is that has been shown, through rational discourse, to be true. I am completely open to changing what I believe, so long as it can be shown to be a more valid position than what I currently hold to. So far, you have...