Search results

You asked for experts. If you want to learn whar science suggests about the early universe, you read or listen to what people who study and try to understand that topic. You throw out what seems to be a request for information and then ignore the suggestion because it does not fit with your...

Thanks. And I note the Defense Intelligence agency has suggested DfQ was incorrect. However it may take a bit longer to determine the real damage and whether the 800 pounds of highhly enriched U was muved before the attack. We do know DfQ is likely to get his information from other than his own...

you are adorable

oh, well yeah, the God issue is a problem. So your experts need to believe in your God? Tends to limit what you consider to be expertise, so stop pretending you have any real interest in learning about the physics of the early universe And enough of the 2+2=5 nonsense, your point has been made...

Try Brian Cox or Neil Degrasse Tyson if you want some expert info. If you need to research their backgrounds to determine if they have the requisite expertise then do so. Cox is a Brit

No I decided DfQ was a traitorous grifter all on my own.

No but a puppy would make me feel all nice and cozy.

Does entropy provide evidence for God? Please explain

As i understand it. current theories in physics/math, perhaps just physics breakdown shortly after the big bang. So our physics does not let ise address issues before the big bang. I imagine if you wished, you could investigate this on your own. Find a real expert

You mis You misread what I wrote, I did not say I distrusted physics.

Do you agree that our math and physics breaks down somewhere before the actual start of the universe as we know it?

How do you know that?

No, it's Donald from Queens. My point is that DfQ aka Capt BoneSpur, Col. Blowhard, etc. determined Iran's enrichment facilities were completely and totally obliterated without sufficient information other than what Little Marco and Tatooed Pete told him. It may in fact be true or DfQ may have...

Ah, so presupposing does not need evidence? You just presuppose because--? To paraphrase Allen Iverson "Evidence! We talkin' about Evidence!!!!

Nice try, you talk in circles. I think within a rational framework because that is the way consciousness works (most of the time). the rational frame work is the way the human brain is put together. It has evolved to be that way. How did I assume fixed immaterial moral laws to frame a question?

Donald from Queens made that statement before any analysis by the military--according to General Raisin Caine.

Not responsive, your Honor. Please instruct the witness to answer the question. Let's ask again, what particular EVIDENCE leads you to presuppose God. Why is this a difficult question?

What particular evidence leads you to presuppose God?

well, in terms of my discussion with Clete—yes. with you, clearly not. you are free to presuppose whatever you wish and live your life accordingly. you are adorable

from what i read physicists and cosmologists indicate our math and physics break down when we get to a short time after the big bang 14.8 +\- billion years ago. as to the rest of your post I am not a believer