Search results

Did we lose @iansmithedi ?

Don’t forget CNN and The Hill: https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/554250-firms-behind-arizona-election-audit-reverse-say-no-data-was-destroyed Though I don’t think they are crazy; I think they are purposely lying to their readers/viewers. Crazy is less morally at fault than lying. But you...

But you can't use anything from NewsNet. NewsNet is not an Arthur-Brain-approved source of evidence. That's because it reports news that is not in keeping with Arthur Brain's understanding of truth. All potential truth sources have to apply to @Arthur Brain for approval. Unfortunately, even the...

If we have assurance, does that mean we don't have to believe anymore? It seems to me, that if we are relying on Jesus Christ to save us, then our belief is in Him, not in any other type of assurance.

Now you're saying that sinners shouldn't bother coming to you for reasons for the hope that is in you. [1Pe 3:15 ESV] 15 but in your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with...

I guess the question should be, How was the equipment certified in the first place? Why would that be hard to do again? If the biggest concern from the SOS is that an in-depth audit might require recertification (which I would think is a given), does that mean those machines have NEVER been...

Then you don't agree that it is by the power of Jesus that all are raised from the dead? To whose power do you attribute the resurrection to condemnation? [Jhn 5:28-29 ESV] 28 Do not marvel at this, for an hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice 29 and come out, those...

I’m not trying to be evasive, but I need to know what part you don’t understand about what I said.

Again, you judge based on your own opinions. My opinions are just as valid, if that’s what we’re going by. But it’s not. Eventually truth will prevail, just like it did on the Russia collusion thing. Why are your standards so tight against the audit, when so loose regarding bearing false...

Explain what?

Then you agree that it is Jesus’ death that will result in all people arising from the dead?

I provided evidence. You rejected it. If you are the arbiter of evidence for American elections, then we’re in big trouble. Fortunately, you aren’t. But you can’t anymore say there is no evidence, at least not truthfully. But you don’t seem to care about truth, based on your news sources.

Paul’s words fit the Genesis narrative. Jesus supported it. Why go looking for a different interpretation, except that you don’t believe the three witnesses.

Once again, the leftist projects his inability to stay on a topic when he can’t refute it, onto the conservative. Just because I don’t have the best copies of the evidence doesn’t mean the evidence doesn’t exist in its proper form. If that’s something you’re unable to comprehend, I have a hard...

You’re denying the power of Jesus Christ’s death to raise all people from the dead.

I agree that your lunacy should be put to bed, but you did ask for evidence, which you chose to ignore, when provided. You have no answer to the evidence as provided, because it is evidence. There’s some question about what the evidence means, but your narrative has been that there is NO...

If the wages of sin is death, how would one know if someone has had their sins paid for? Wouldn’t it be that he was resurrected—saved out of death? So then, tell me who is NOT going to be resurrected? Please cite verses.

Hello? Anyone in there? Is Arthur Troll just moving on to another bridge, now that he can’t handwave his false narrative around?

Translation: “We don’t have it, and we know we’re about to go to jail, so we’ll pretend to be offended.”

Evidence: I can’t tell what the filenames mean, but there are a couple words I can read: “databases”, which is the name of the folder, and “adjudicableballotstore” with the date of the election.