Search results

No big lizards after the fall?

Then you agree that they are using “old bones” and just think they are gluing them together wrong?

One is probably too many.

Why have you before?

So, do you agree with them or not?

That would require free will, and they only recognize non-Calvinists as being able to exercise free will.

Wait! Hold it! There's been a change in the decision: https://babylonbee.com/news/after-prosecutors-find-mail-in-jury-votes-at-3am-rittenhouse-now-guilty

Iow: when black or brown folks are put in jail for crimes they actually committed, while an innocent white person is allowed to go free, that’s white supremacy. At least we know what the term means now.

https://babylonbee.com/news/rittenhouse-sandmann-agree-to-share-joint-custody-of-cnn

That’s not insane—that’s colorblindness!

So now it’s judicial fraud because the results weren’t what you wanted? Why isn’t that allowed for election results?

That’s because the evidence was so strong? Or does that not matter?

He probably works for the FBI.

And such a trial needs to follow a lot of criminal trials.

The prosecution members who tried to get him convicted by unscrupulous means should be locked up for the same amount of time they wanted him locked up for.

Perhaps. Calvinism needs a good pep squad to keep going.

Especially since he hasn't been on the site since he started this thread in May.

Um...what weight does the law offer, when it can't even police itself? https://thehill.com/changing-america/enrichment/arts-culture/582010-kyle-rittenhouse-lawyers-accuse-prosecution-of

https://babylonbee.com/news/lebron-confused-by-rittenhouse-as-hes-never-seen-anyone-cry-for-real-before