Search results

Where/how did Dean Obeidallah get this video that he says Tucker did NOT show? Was he, himself, the cameraman? That would place him (as you say) "alongside" this crowd, right at this J6 scene, which, according to you, would make him culpable of any and every crime committed there. Has he been...

I've lost track of what became of that informative TOL post that was written by either @User Name, @Arthur Brain, @annabenedetti, or @Rusha (I forget which one of them wrote it), wherein they were kind enough to fill us in with all the info they have to contradict what you say, there: you know...

From your posts, at least, it really does not seem as though you've ever scrupled much over such a question as that (a mere question of Names), User.

If this is J6 footage, how does (((DeanObeidallah))) have access to it so as to be able to show it to his viewers on Twitter, and why is it that Schumer and McConnell have not thrown a temper tantrum about his doing so, nor attacked him for it, demanding he cease and desist from showing it to...

VS Which is it? Either MAGA are convinced, or are they are not, and are only pretending to be convinced. Which is it? It would be impossible for you to pretend to be stupid, @annabenedetti.

And you, Trump-hater, are not even going to give that post a thumb-up, despite the fact that in it I was highlighting something less than ideal about Trump's choice of words? Closet MAGA are you now?

What "reason" has been given by anti-Republicans like Mitch McConnell for opposing Tucker? If any "reason" they may have given is not actually a reason (you can agree that not everything called a "reason" is actually a reason, right?), then they have not given a reason; and if they've not given...

The term "RINO in disguise" seems redundant, since a RINO is simply a non-Republican trying to disguise himself/herself as a Republican. Instead of saying "a RINO in disguise", one could leave out the superfluous and unnecessary redundance by saying "a non-Republican in disguise", or simply "a...

Had you reflected on it, you might have noticed that what you have written, here, is nothing more than a pointing out that mankind is politically polarized, written in incidental terms of the bias of your side of that polarization. But who isn't already aware of the obvious polarization you are...

Do you call Kenneth Copeland an "evangelical leader"? If so, why? Do you say Kenneth Copeland prays? If so, to whom do you say he prays?

So long as the Bible does not support what you believe, it is inevitable that any and every verse you pick will be a verse that does not support what you believe. But I take it you mean that it is inevitable that we will pick verses we think support what we believe.

Yes, the angel protected the lady. But it also sounds as though he protected those ill-willed hoodlums from themselves--warned them off from taking action they'd regret.

I don't call them "health nazis", I just call them "nazis".

What falsehoods are you convinced that Tucker Carlson was promoting in public?

How do you feel about you lying to us for so long and nevertheless always being known as the substanceless joke you are?

Have fun trying to prove that Tucker lied, you lying oinker.

I don't get it. That's Jerome Lester Horowitz, no? By comparing him to someone whose guts you hate, are you trying to tell us you're an anti-Semite?

and paid-for.

What do you mean? Answer this question without using the word "Republican". What about someone makes you willing to call him or her "Republican"?

Why do you keep calling people who you say are on your side, "Republican"?